2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of radioxenon releases in Australia using atmospheric dispersion modelling tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in three samples from November 2008 Tinker et al observed Xe-135/Xe-133 ratios ranging from 0.004 to 0.072 at the stack of the ANSTO radiopharmaceutical facility in Sydney, and ten samples measured in Melbourne-approximately 500 km away-over the following months had a maximum Xe-135/Xe-133 ratio of 0.16 and a maximum Xe-135 activity of 0.33±0.15 mBq/m 3 . 29 Seven of the 10 measurements were upper limits. Similar findings are reported by Saey et al for the Nuclear Technology Products Radioisotopes (Pty) MIPF in Pelindaba, South Africa and the Institut des Radioelements MIPF in Fleurus, Belgium.…”
Section: Emissions From Medical Isotope Production Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, in three samples from November 2008 Tinker et al observed Xe-135/Xe-133 ratios ranging from 0.004 to 0.072 at the stack of the ANSTO radiopharmaceutical facility in Sydney, and ten samples measured in Melbourne-approximately 500 km away-over the following months had a maximum Xe-135/Xe-133 ratio of 0.16 and a maximum Xe-135 activity of 0.33±0.15 mBq/m 3 . 29 Seven of the 10 measurements were upper limits. Similar findings are reported by Saey et al for the Nuclear Technology Products Radioisotopes (Pty) MIPF in Pelindaba, South Africa and the Institut des Radioelements MIPF in Fleurus, Belgium.…”
Section: Emissions From Medical Isotope Production Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 98%