2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-012-1016-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of range of motion restriction within the hip joint

Abstract: In total hip arthroplasty, determining the impingement free range of motion requirement is a complex task. This is because in the native hip, motion is restricted by both impingement as well as soft tissue restraint. The aim of this study is to determine a range of motion benchmark which can identify motions which are at risk from impingement and those which are constrained due to soft tissue. Two experimental methodologies were used to determine motions which were limited by impingement and those motions whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Range 120°30°45°45°45°35°Turley et al [4] 113°28°45°45°48°31°Boone et al [6] 120°9.5°32°33°39°30°Roaas et al [7] In 90' flex 38°40°Kouyoumdjian et al [5] Figure 5a …”
Section: Movement Flex Ext Ir Er Abd Add Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Range 120°30°45°45°45°35°Turley et al [4] 113°28°45°45°48°31°Boone et al [6] 120°9.5°32°33°39°30°Roaas et al [7] In 90' flex 38°40°Kouyoumdjian et al [5] Figure 5a …”
Section: Movement Flex Ext Ir Er Abd Add Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Australian Orthopaedic Association's National Joint Replacement Registry (AOA NJRR), the 14 year cumulative percent revision for primary THA is 9.5% of which 24.2% is due to dislocation [2]. Thus, new implant designs, bearing surfaces and the use of muscle sparing surgical approaches claiming increased stability without standard hip precautions are being utilised [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10. The DC motor controlled the ball screw to move the slide table Y attached the femoral shaft in -Y-axis as flexion with 20 degrees from neutral alignment and +Y-axis as extension with 20 degrees from neutral alignment as human activities [20]. The degrees of flexion and extension were converted to displacement of Y position and were counted the ball screw rotating by encoder The internal rotation and external rotation were controlled by stepping motor around Z-axis as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Hip Simulation Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…11. The stepping motor controlled a thrust ball bearing to rotate the rotate table Z attached the femoral shaft around +Z-axis as internal rotation with 20 degrees from neutral alignment and -Z-axis as external rotation with 20 degrees from neutral alignment as human activities [20]. The degrees of internal rotation and external rotation were counted by step motor rotating.…”
Section: Hip Simulation Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the known technical limitations of these techniques, the ROM at the replaced hip joint is an approximated estimation and the exact cup-to-neck interaction cannot be determined with these instruments. In vitro [24,25] and in silico [26][27][28][29] evaluations have thus been performed as well, but these suffer from unrealistic soft tissue arrangements and overall motion and loading conditions. Today, very little is known about the ROM at the replaced hip in large and extreme joint movements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%