1964
DOI: 10.1002/pol.1964.100020713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of rate constants from thermogravimetric data

Abstract: A method has been derived whereby the characteristic constants of the rate equation may be derived directly from the thermogravimetric analysis curve. The method described, in contradistinction to previously described methods, does not require transformation to a time scale, nor pointwise graphical differentiation, and no mathematical approximations are made. The method is applicable to any reaction showing one or more successive thermogravimetric inflection points, requiring only that the location of the infl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1966
1966
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A method is described in the literature [13], where the inflection point in the TG curve is determined. The final equation is as follows:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method is described in the literature [13], where the inflection point in the TG curve is determined. The final equation is as follows:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuoss, Salyev and Wilson [13] suggested an expression for the evaluation of E and A for first-order kinetics. These are calculated using the relationships …”
Section: (D) Fuoss Methods [13]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Horowitz-Metzger [10], the Freeman-Carroll [11], the Coats-Redfern [12] and the Fuoss [13] methods. The data were then subjected to the method of least squares.…”
Section: Kinetic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several methods for this purpose, which differ in the manner of thermogravimetric curve approximation (e.g. the Redfern [5], Freeman-Carroll [6] and Fuosse [7] methods). We In the version used here, the straight line log~-~ vs. 1/T is obtained by the application of the least-square method.…”
Section: John Wiley and Sons Limitea[ Chichester Kiad6 Budat~stmentioning
confidence: 99%