1978
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-41.5.356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Raw Milk Quality Tests

Abstract: A study was done to evaluate raw milk quality tests in an attempt to answer some questions regarding values or standards by which milk acceptance is determined. Initially, of 315 individual producer samples, 226 (72%) had proteolytic psychrotrophs. More than 90% of these psychrotrophs were of the genus Pseudomonas. All samples were obtained from four dairy companies processing milk in Georgia. One dairy had individual producers whose milk samples contained a large percentage of thermoduric psychrotrophs. “Bitt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dairy products possessing good flavour and shelf-life cannot be consistently produced when made from raw milk of poor organoleptic and bacteriological quality (White et al, 1978).…”
Section: Milk Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dairy products possessing good flavour and shelf-life cannot be consistently produced when made from raw milk of poor organoleptic and bacteriological quality (White et al, 1978).…”
Section: Milk Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pseudomonas spp. have long been regarded as spoilage bacteria because of their ability to multiply in dairy products kept at low temperature (White et al, 1978;Ternström et al, 1993;De Jonghe et al, 2011). Many species in this genus also exhibit proteolytic and lipolytic activities that may eventually yield organoleptic defects and thus unacceptable finished products (Malik and Swanson, 1975;Arslan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Biological Factors Influencing the Shelf Life Of Fluid Milkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the relation between various methods of evaluating quality is likewise rather imprecise (7,8). The lack of precision may be related to the high variability in bacterial quality from one sampling period to another (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%