2018
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/370/1/012020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of reaction time performance and subjective drowsiness during whole-body vibration exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are consistent with findings of similar studies reporting that occupational WBV exposure generally yields decrements in reaction time or cognitive outcomes [ 20 , 42–45 ]. These effects seem to emerge largely following shorter, lower amplitude exposures at frequency patterns outside occupational WBV exposure patterns of machinery, within the frequency range of 4.1 to 5 Hz [ 8 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are consistent with findings of similar studies reporting that occupational WBV exposure generally yields decrements in reaction time or cognitive outcomes [ 20 , 42–45 ]. These effects seem to emerge largely following shorter, lower amplitude exposures at frequency patterns outside occupational WBV exposure patterns of machinery, within the frequency range of 4.1 to 5 Hz [ 8 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These effects seem to emerge largely following shorter, lower amplitude exposures at frequency patterns outside occupational WBV exposure patterns of machinery, within the frequency range of 4.1 to 5 Hz [ 8 , 26 ]. The WBV exposure conditions and reaction time outcomes in the present study, are most aligned with work reporting reaction time increases ranging from 5% [ 43 ] to 25% [ 42 ], placing our findings of an increase in reaction time of ∼10% after sitting or walking rest break activities within reasonable confidence. This seems to suggest that differing effects on cognitive performance reported in this study are not by random chance, but rather a product of different exposures stimulating certain mechanistic pathways.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Our findings differ from those reported by Azizan and colleagues [10,30], who observed an increase in lapses after 20 min of random whole-body vibration (WBV) exposure ranging from 1 to 15 Hz, with respect to the baseline condition. In contrast, our study did not find a statistically significant effect of FTV on lapses.…”
Section: Cognitive Effectscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…= [7,34]), and 16 ms (p = 0.014, 95% C.I. = [2,30]), respectively). No significant differences were found when looking at the slowest reaction times or the number of lapses across the different conditions.…”
Section: Effect Of Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%