The previously presented mesoscopic model [Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 16, 22555, (2014)] for battery electrodes consisting of phase-change insertion materials is incorporated into porous-electrode theory and validated by comparing the simulation results with experimental data from continuous and intermittent galvanostatic discharge of a LiFePO 4 electrode under various operating conditions. The model features mesoscopic LiFePO 4 units that undergo non-equilibrium lithiation/delithiation and fast solid-state diffusion. Good agreement with the experimental data supports the validity of this model. GITT analysis suggests that the slow evolution of the electrode polarization during each pulse and the subsequent relaxation period is due to Li transport between LiFePO 4 units rather than diffusion within the units. Galvanostatic pulse techniques commonly used to determine diffusivities of inserted species in solid-solution systems may also be used to estimate the equilibrium potential of individual mesoscopic units for which no actual measurement has been reported to date. Further analysis of the GITT experiments suggests an alternative pathway for the intermittent charge/discharge of LFP electrodes. Depending on the overall depth-of-discharge/charge of the electrode, relaxation time and the incremental depth-of-discharge/charge of each pulse, the solid-solution capacity available in the Li-rich/Li-poor end-member may be able to accommodate Li insertion/extraction entirely without phase transformation during each pulse. LiFePO 4 (LFP) has proved promising as a high-power active material for the positive electrodes in Li-ion batteries. Its outstanding performance has been subject of intensive research since its discovery in 1997.1 LFP undergoes a phase separation between the Li-poor Li ε FePO 4 and Li-rich Li 1−ε FePO 4 phases (ε and ε 1) during lithiation/delithiation, which is manifested by its equilibrium potential remaining virtually constant over a range of intermediate compositions.1,2 In spite of this phase separation, electrodes consisting of either nano-scale LFP particles 3,4 and/or particles coated with ionically/electronically conducting materials 5-8 exhibit a high rate capability and long cycle life. However, the seeming contradiction between the biphasic nature of the material and its high performance is not reflected in conventional models 9-27 describing the movement of phase boundaries and associated mechanical effects inside the particles during lithiation/delithiation.The advent of high resolution phase mapping tools has lead to more accurate characterization of the charge/discharge dynamics of LFP electrodes. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] Maier et al. 32 tracked the phase boundary propagation in a large millimeter-scale LFP single crystal during chemical delithiation and observed the formation of a large amount of microstructural defects such as pores and cracks. Cabana et al. 33 used soft X-ray ptychographic microscopy (with a spatial resolution of ∼5 nm) and X-ray absorption spec...