2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icsmc.2010.5641768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of recording factors in EEG-based personal identification: A vital step in real implementations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More complex problems often require a larger number of anchor points to better model the data. Referring to the num ber of sub-segments, including more diverse EEG samples is a way to obtain better identification performance [5]. From Fig.2(a) and (b), we can conclude that longer recording dura tion achieves higher accuracy.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…More complex problems often require a larger number of anchor points to better model the data. Referring to the num ber of sub-segments, including more diverse EEG samples is a way to obtain better identification performance [5]. From Fig.2(a) and (b), we can conclude that longer recording dura tion achieves higher accuracy.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The subjects were required to stay calm during recording. The data collection scheme is the same as that in [4,5,6]. Each original EEG segment lasts for around 5 minutes.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering that the diet and personal circadian are crucial factors affecting the EEG signals compared to other factors, we addressed how much the diet and times of day affected a person's EEG recordings [34]. It has shown that recording factors have some effects on the system performance, and if more diversity samples were included in modeling, the higher accuracy would be obtained.…”
Section: Naive Bayes Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%