2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-022-02865-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR normalization in the Neopyropia (Pyropia) oomycete pathogen Pythium porphyrae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies also identified GAPDH as the recommended reference gene in different developmental stages of fungi Sparassis latifolia [28] and amphibian Andrias davidianus [29]. Additionally, GAPDH showed the best stability in Pythium porphyrae under conditions of salinity, pH and infection stages [30]. As far as we know, there are only a few reports selecting and validating the suitable reference genes to compare the gene expression between the mycelia and sclerotia of pathogens, such as S. sclerotiorum and Rhizoctonia solani.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies also identified GAPDH as the recommended reference gene in different developmental stages of fungi Sparassis latifolia [28] and amphibian Andrias davidianus [29]. Additionally, GAPDH showed the best stability in Pythium porphyrae under conditions of salinity, pH and infection stages [30]. As far as we know, there are only a few reports selecting and validating the suitable reference genes to compare the gene expression between the mycelia and sclerotia of pathogens, such as S. sclerotiorum and Rhizoctonia solani.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In current study, EF1α was an ideal reference gene in S. rolfsii subjected to photoperiod and pH treatments. EF1α is also commonly used as a stably expressed reference gene in many species under various conditions, such as Mythimna separata under different photoperiod treatments [33], Pythium porphyrae under different pH treatments [30], Athetis dissimilis under different insecticide treatments [3] and Glycine max under different developmental stages and stress conditions [34]. Other than EF1α, PGK and β-TUB were also suitable reference genes in S. rolfsii across photoperiod and pH treatments, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%