2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89880-9_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Representation Models for Text Classification with AutoML Tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not tenable in a highly diverse and large manuscript collection which is in a flux due to the ongoing labeling by a user community. Although efforts have been spent in this area, such as Google's 'AutoML' [160]- [164] service, the problem of autonomous training has not yet been solved satisfactorily [165], [166]. Therefore, as the final topic in the 'robustness theme', we will need to explore methods that allow an overfit of neuralnetwork models, without relying on a label-greedy validation scheme in k-fold evaluation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not tenable in a highly diverse and large manuscript collection which is in a flux due to the ongoing labeling by a user community. Although efforts have been spent in this area, such as Google's 'AutoML' [160]- [164] service, the problem of autonomous training has not yet been solved satisfactorily [165], [166]. Therefore, as the final topic in the 'robustness theme', we will need to explore methods that allow an overfit of neuralnetwork models, without relying on a label-greedy validation scheme in k-fold evaluation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%