2013
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.116686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of resistance form of different preparation features on mandibular molars

Abstract: Within the limitation of this study, reducing the tapering of occlusocervival dimension is the most effective way in increasing resistance form, although, other features were also effective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Auxiliary retentive methods are used for molars prepared as abutment for bridges, abutments with more than 20 o conversion, teeth less than 3 mm in length to anterior teeth and 4 mm in length to molars, or length-to-diameter ratio of ≤0.4 [30,[33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auxiliary retentive methods are used for molars prepared as abutment for bridges, abutments with more than 20 o conversion, teeth less than 3 mm in length to anterior teeth and 4 mm in length to molars, or length-to-diameter ratio of ≤0.4 [30,[33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%