2015
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/1654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Results of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Post Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability

Abstract: BACKGROUND:The study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of arthroscopic repair of post-traumatic Bankart lesions with the use of suture anchors. Patients with >20% bony lesions, SLAP (superior labral tear from anterior to posterior) lesions and multi-directional instability were excluded. The patients were followed up for a period of minimum 4 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair with use of suture anchors in 35 patients with traumatic recurrent anterior inst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Study by Mishra et al in New Delhi (India) had 2 and by Chandra et al had 1 patient with apprehension post-operatively. 25,26 The mean post-operative total Rowe score in our study was 94.20 which is almost similar to studies performed by Kalkar et al, Jadhav et al and Parmar et al in having a total Rowe score of 95.5, 95.63 and 94.16 post-operatively respectively. 21,27,28 In this study, out of 37 patients, 32 (86.5%) came out with excellent results, 2 (5.4%) showed good, 2 (5.4%) showed fair and 1 (2.7%) had poor outcome at the end of 1-year follow-up period.…”
Section: Pre-operative Dislocations Distributionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Study by Mishra et al in New Delhi (India) had 2 and by Chandra et al had 1 patient with apprehension post-operatively. 25,26 The mean post-operative total Rowe score in our study was 94.20 which is almost similar to studies performed by Kalkar et al, Jadhav et al and Parmar et al in having a total Rowe score of 95.5, 95.63 and 94.16 post-operatively respectively. 21,27,28 In this study, out of 37 patients, 32 (86.5%) came out with excellent results, 2 (5.4%) showed good, 2 (5.4%) showed fair and 1 (2.7%) had poor outcome at the end of 1-year follow-up period.…”
Section: Pre-operative Dislocations Distributionsupporting
confidence: 89%