Evaluation of Retrofit Approaches for Two Social Housing Tower Blocks in Portsmouth, UK

Abstract

The UK aims to reduce its carbon emissions focusing on the renovation of its existing building stock, particularly on the residential sector. Within this group, social housing is an excellent candidate for retrofits, but faces specific challenges. The cases presented in this study are social housing tower blocks in the City of Portsmouth, which are destined to be retrofitted but present particularities within its architecture, heating system, and occupants' behaviour and comfort perception. This study presents an analysis of the thermal performance of these buildings after different retrofit intervention scenarios were undertaken to evaluate heating loads, comfort and overheating. A dynamic simulation model was developed using the software TRNSYS and included performance evaluation under future climate change scenarios. Firstly, the buildings were modelled under different occupier energy profiles and the results in all cases, show that the physical properties of the building lead to a high level of energy consumption and discomfort. Moreover, the simulation of possible retrofits demonstrated that improving the building envelope to meet 2010 Building Regulations or stricter standards would result in a decrease of more than 80% of the heating load but would result in overheating if no adequate shading is installed. The analysis indicates that the best performing retrofit corresponded to a mixed system of MHRV for heating and natural ventilation during the summer. The paper concludes that (a) existing buildings are inefficient and a retrofit would result in a complete change in their energy performance and (b) that a thorough economic appraisal is required to select the best environmentally and economically viable interventions.

Energy effectiveness of passive cooling design strategies to reduce the impact of long-term heatwaves on occupants’ thermal comfort in Europe: Climate change and mitigation

“…It is also important to remember that the changes from the 1965 standards to the 1976 standards were the first step towards energy efficiency in the residential sector (Brown et al, 2019). The IEA has published guidelines on implementing rapid electricity use curtailment (Aragon et al, 2018;Crawley, 2008), and studies have examined the significant impact of thermal properties of buildings during the long-term heatwaves frequently experienced in the summer due to climate change (Etxebarria-Mallea et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2021;Natarajan & Levermore, 2007a, 2007b). However, it has been stressed that these measures have never been assessed in the context of an overheating risk experienced in newly built housing stock (Beizaee et al, 2013;Berardi & Jafarpur, 2020).…”

Assessing overheating risk and thermal comfort in state-of-the-art prototype houses that combat exacerbated climate change in UK

“…The main reason for retrofitting these new types of residential buildings is to combat energy consumption in winter, reduce CO2 emissions and overall reduce household energy bills, which are rising globally due to reduced fossil fuel reserves worldwide [5]. The existing social housing plans from previous decades were thermally insufficient, where the building material for insulation was not compatible with UK climate change scenarios [6].…”

Distributive Justice and Urban Form Adaptation to Flooding Risks: Spatial Analysis to Identify Toronto's Priority Neighborhoods

“…Architects University of Toronto, 2008;Benko et al, 2018;Veschambre, 2018). Some of these improvements include climate mitigation strategies (i.e., decreasing greenhouse gas emissions through improved energy efficiency) (Aragon et al, 2018;Seebauer et al, 2019). Yet, there is a need for studies that inform both research and policy on the adaptation of tower neighborhoods to climatic events including flooding through participatory processes that are grounded in context-specific needs and the local communities' lived experiences as well as the knowledge of local experts.…”