2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of rigid body force in liquid sloshing problems of a partially filled tank: Traditional CFD/SPH/ALE comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These techniques require mesh motion algorithms and remeshing techniques to adapt the discretization of the fluid surrounding the solid. Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) techniques (Sarrate et al , 2001; Hu et al , 2001; Baiges et al , 2017; Cai et al , 2021) have been extensively used to include mesh motions in the governing equations. Sliding meshes have also been proposed for tracking rigid solids (Devolder et al , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques require mesh motion algorithms and remeshing techniques to adapt the discretization of the fluid surrounding the solid. Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) techniques (Sarrate et al , 2001; Hu et al , 2001; Baiges et al , 2017; Cai et al , 2021) have been extensively used to include mesh motions in the governing equations. Sliding meshes have also been proposed for tracking rigid solids (Devolder et al , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun et al [26] examined the impact of fluid viscosity on sloshing behavior using the SPH approach, demonstrating the relationship between viscosity and sloshing amplitude. Cai et al [27] evaluated the accuracy of different simulation approaches (VOF, SPH, ALE ) in predicting rigid body forces due to fluid movement in partially filled tanks, favoring SPH for this purpose. Ren and Vafaei [28] studied the seismic response of rectangular concrete tanks using both finite element numerical methods and the British Standards Institution [29] method, highlighting the suitability of the latter for certain earthquake scenarios while noting its limitations for high-frequency earthquakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Craig et al [47] also showed that RANS simulation using k-ω was less accurate than its no-model flow counterpart. Recently, Cai et al [48] compared between different free surface capturing approaches (VoF, SPH, ALE) and they also compared the prediction accuracy of unsteady k-, LES-WALE and DES, and no-model. They found that the no-model and the LES model provided the best correlation to the experimental results, which is in line with our general findings but is not a complete answer as we know that the no-model approach is sub-optimal for complex sloshing flows while a full LES simulation is often excessively computationally intensive, especially in an industrial context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%