2010
DOI: 10.4304/jcm.5.3.197-204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Router Implementations for Explicit Congestion Control Schemes

Abstract: <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left; margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; mso-layout-grid-align: none;" align="left"><span style="font-family: ";Times-Bold";,";serif";; font-size: 9pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-bidi-font-family: Times-Bold;">Explicit congestion control schemes use router feedback to overcome limitations of the standard mechanisms of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). These approaches require additional packet processing in every router and therefore raise the question whether,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…N = 16 processors with F = 4 suffice to execute the required number of clock cycles. [5] shows that the parallel architecture of NPs is not suitable for the sequential bandwidth assignment steps of some future explicit congestion control schemes. Hence, we implemented the respective critical functions at registertransfer level and the non-critical part in a software-level module.…”
Section: Prototype and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…N = 16 processors with F = 4 suffice to execute the required number of clock cycles. [5] shows that the parallel architecture of NPs is not suitable for the sequential bandwidth assignment steps of some future explicit congestion control schemes. Hence, we implemented the respective critical functions at registertransfer level and the non-critical part in a software-level module.…”
Section: Prototype and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Often, emulating such operations is time-consuming and inefficient, while implementing them at register-transfer level on an FPGA would be fast and resource-efficient (cf. [5]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…XCP gives the routers a fine-grained control over sending rates of flows [13]. XCP enables the routers in the network to return explicit feedback back to the hosts and allows the routers in the network to continuously coordinate the sending speed of participating hosts.…”
Section: Xcpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability of the XCP protocol depends on the accuracy of estimating the number of flows currently in the network, but it is difficult to accurately estimate the number of flows. Once the estimated value is too small, it is easy for burst traffic to occur on the network, and if the estimated value is too large, a low link utilization rate can easily occur [10]. The above protocols are the latest in the field of congestion control, but none of them can meet the requirements of the 5G network, and they cannot achieve a balance in bandwidth utilization, fairness, and convergence speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%