2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of salt concentrations, chromogenic media and anatomical sampling sites for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, double sampling (both nares and skin) is recommended in studies dealing with the detection of MSSA carriers. Similar results have been observed for MRSA (17,32). The spa types detected in nasal and skin samples were different in 50% of the positive animals in both samples, indicating that double sampling increases the diversity of spa types found.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Therefore, double sampling (both nares and skin) is recommended in studies dealing with the detection of MSSA carriers. Similar results have been observed for MRSA (17,32). The spa types detected in nasal and skin samples were different in 50% of the positive animals in both samples, indicating that double sampling increases the diversity of spa types found.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This risk is definitely higher in developing countries because of costs, where the CHROMagar may be used as a screening test for MRSA without follow-up confirmatory tests such as the PBP'2 latex test which detects the mecA gene responsible for methicillin resistance. For this reason, it has been recommended that with the use of MRSA-selective chromogenic agar such as CHROMagar, positive samples should be confirmed rapidly by latex agglutination with antibodies directed against PBP 2a (3133). The 0.0% prevalence for MRSA using CHROMagar in the current study may be a true reflection of the MRSA carriage by the humans sampled because CHROMagar used in the current study and other chromogenic agar were reported to have high sensitivity (>95%) (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility of management playing some role in the lack of transmission from pigs to man cannot be ignored. However, it is pertinent to mention that sampling from the anterior nares of pigs alone may have been a limitation since it was reported that the skin behind the ears was the anatomical site with the highest relative sensitivity (91.4%) for MRSA detection compared to perineum and anterior nares, with a relative sensitivity of 76.5 and 75.3%, respectively (33). Pigs have been reported to be an important reservoir of zoonotic ST 398 and CC 398 (14, 15) and human infections acquired through contact with pigs are also well documented in the literature (14, 16, 17, 35, 36, 41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dry sows, farrowing, weaners, growers, and finishers). On Farm-A, to optimise sensitivity of the testing procedure, swabs from pigs were collected from the skin caudal and adjacent to the pinnae and from the external nares 31 . With the aim of determining if MRSA was present in the pigs on Farm-A, a previously described pooled sampling method was used: to detect MRSA carriage at a prevalence of at least 2% and assuming 90% test sensitivity with 95% confidence the minimum number of swabs per pool and the minimum number of pools required was calculated to be 10 and 17 respectively, using Epitools online 32 http://epitools.ausvet.com.au.…”
Section: Methods and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%