2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00248-021-01727-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Sample Preservation Approaches for Better Insect Microbiome Research According to Next-Generation and Third-Generation Sequencing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The location explained more of the variance when compared to the binary explanatory variable of the presence of preservation (whether a sample was preserved at all [1 month, 6 month, 9-month treatments] or never preserved [fresh and starved treatments]). In another short-term study only preserving specimens up to 60 days, the effect of preservation was also detected in PERMANOVAs in explaining microbiome compositions [ 36 ]. However, this study also tested different storage mediums (e.g., ethanol, freezing, RNA Later, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The location explained more of the variance when compared to the binary explanatory variable of the presence of preservation (whether a sample was preserved at all [1 month, 6 month, 9-month treatments] or never preserved [fresh and starved treatments]). In another short-term study only preserving specimens up to 60 days, the effect of preservation was also detected in PERMANOVAs in explaining microbiome compositions [ 36 ]. However, this study also tested different storage mediums (e.g., ethanol, freezing, RNA Later, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be some microbial taxa that do not preserve well in 80% ethanol and are thus less represented in the preserved samples, also explaining why richness is lower in those short-term samples. However, multiple studies have shown that ethanol preservation is the ideal method for preserving microbiomes [36,39]. Additionally, although we believe ethanol was the only preservative used in our samples, in some older museum specimens, formalin was initially used to preserve specimens, starting in 1891 and gaining popularity into the first quarter of the twentieth century [40].…”
Section: Microbial Composition Preservation and Gut Microbiome Commun...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Location explained more of the variance when compared to the binary explanatory variable of the presence of preservation (whether a sample was preserved at all [1 month, 6 month, 9 month treatments], or never preserved [fresh and starved treatments]). In another short-term study only preserving specimens up to 60 days, the effect of preservation was also detected in their PERMANOVAs in explaining microbiome compositions [15]. However, this short-term study also tested different storage mediums (e.g.…”
Section: Microbial Composition Preservation and Gut Microbiome Commun...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Generally, while some Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) success is age-dependent, it is possible to obtain viable genetic information from host specimens up to hundreds of years old. In fact, xation, storage, sample conservation and documentation of the specimens' history, rather than extraction methodology, are often the more crucial factors for successful use of historic DNA [13,14,15]. While microbiome compositions in animal hosts are not signi cantly altered by short-term preservation [14], the effects of decades-long preservation require further study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for the bacterial diversity of the superfamily Gerroidea in Gerromorpha, and the bacterial and fungal diversity of Cimicomorpha and Pentatomomorpha, the bacterial and fungal communities of the remaining true bugs studied here have never been included in microbial studies. In the technical aspect, both full-length bacterial 16S and fungal ITS amplicons were sequenced by the PacBio platform, which could minimize the overestimation or underestimation of community diversity ( 40 , 41 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%