2016
DOI: 10.26226/morressier.56d6be74d462b80296c973ad
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of sampling locations in pregnant women and newborns for the detection of colonization with antibiotic-resistant bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although MRSA may be detected in various sites, it is commonly detected in the nares. 11,12 We screened for maternal MRSA colonization using nasal and vaginal samples in our study. We used nasal and umbilical surface swabs for neonatal screening because these sites had the highest detection efficiency in previous reports.…”
Section: Study Design Period and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although MRSA may be detected in various sites, it is commonly detected in the nares. 11,12 We screened for maternal MRSA colonization using nasal and vaginal samples in our study. We used nasal and umbilical surface swabs for neonatal screening because these sites had the highest detection efficiency in previous reports.…”
Section: Study Design Period and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used nasal and umbilical surface swabs for neonatal screening because these sites had the highest detection efficiency in previous reports. 11,12 All samples were collected by midwives and doctors at enrollment and immediately after delivery using a standardized sterile procedure. If MRSA was detected in the cultures of the fetal samples collected immediately after delivery, it should be considered almost entirely due to vertical transmission.…”
Section: Study Design Period and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%