1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00715.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of sampling methods for the detection of Salmonella in broiler flocks

Abstract: M.N. SKOV, B. CARSTENSEN, N. TORNO šE AN D M . MA DS E N. 1999. The present study compares four different sampling methods potentially applicable to detection of Salmonella in broiler flocks, based on collection of faecal samples (i) by hand, 300 fresh faecal samples (ii) absorbed on five sheets of paper (iii) absorbed on five pairs of socks (elastic cotton tubes pulled over the boots and termed 'socks') and (iv) by using only one pair of socks. Twenty-three broiler flocks were included in the investigation an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examination of individual faecal samples on a sample of pigs therefore constitutes a poorly sensitive method [12]. Similarly, environmental swabbing in broiler flocks was found to be more sensitive than individual coprology performed on a sample of animals [34]. Since ubiquitous Salmonella are resistant in the environment of the pigs, pen samples representing several individuals (between 12 to 20) appeared to be an appropriate way to assess the microbiological status of finishing pig pens or batches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examination of individual faecal samples on a sample of pigs therefore constitutes a poorly sensitive method [12]. Similarly, environmental swabbing in broiler flocks was found to be more sensitive than individual coprology performed on a sample of animals [34]. Since ubiquitous Salmonella are resistant in the environment of the pigs, pen samples representing several individuals (between 12 to 20) appeared to be an appropriate way to assess the microbiological status of finishing pig pens or batches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sock swabs, comprising a folded section of tubegrip bandage applied over the ball of the foot of the sampler and turned four times during sampling, were first described in Denmark (Skov et al, 1999). In the USA boot swabs utilising gauze surgical shoe covers were used and found to be superior to drag swabs (Caldwell et al, 1998;McCrea et al, 2005;McCrea et al, 2008) even when the method of stepping on drag swabs was used (Buhr et al, 2007).…”
Section: Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From cage flocks 5 x 200g samples were taken, thoroughly mixed and sub-sampled to provide a considerable margin for error. In non-cage flocks five pairs of boot or sock swabs were taken, based on the finding that in Danish broiler flocks this was equivalent to 300 individual faeces, each cultured as part of a 5g pool involving 60 separate cultures in total (Skov et al, 1999). This took no account of the different housing systems used for laying flocks compared with broilers, the age of the birds, number of organisms likely to be excreted (Jordan et al, 2004), or use of vaccination.…”
Section: Sampling and Test Methods Used In The Baseline Survey And Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boot swabs have been shown to be simple and effective for detection of Salmonella excretion in chicken flocks (Gradel et al, 2002;Skov et al, 1999) and proved superior to US-style drag swabs (Buhr et al, 2007;Caldwell et al, 1994;McCrea et al, 2006;McCrea et al, 2005;Opengart et al, 1991). Comparative sampling studies in turkey flocks confirmed the efficiency of boot swabbing ) in turkey flocks, but additional sensitivity could be gained, allowing a reduction in the number of boot swabs from five to one pair, if an additional large dust sample was taken (Arnold et al, 2009).…”
Section: Monitoring Systems In the Eumentioning
confidence: 99%