2005
DOI: 10.4314/mjar.v4i2.31781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of sampling techniques for millipedes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since epigeon sampling by pitfall traps usually covers several seasons due to high seasonal dynamics (e.g., Inyang & Emosairue, 2003; Pekár, 2002; Siewers et al., 2014), trap samples from spring and autumn sampling periods were pooled for each trap, and summary data on species richness and epigaeic activity were used in the analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since epigeon sampling by pitfall traps usually covers several seasons due to high seasonal dynamics (e.g., Inyang & Emosairue, 2003; Pekár, 2002; Siewers et al., 2014), trap samples from spring and autumn sampling periods were pooled for each trap, and summary data on species richness and epigaeic activity were used in the analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%