2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 main protease and inhibitor interactions using dihedral angle distributions and radial distribution function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparative simulations were carried out to investigate the molecular dynamics of free GEM and graphene/GEM complexes in a watersalt medium. Afterwards, various parameters were investigated by utilizing trajectory files of both complexes acquired from simulation such as Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD), Radius of gyration (Rg), Solvent Accessible Surface Area (SASA) and Radial Distribution Function (RDF), to estimate the conformational change, stability and degree of rigidity and compactness of the simulated complexes (Lamichhane and Ghimire, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparative simulations were carried out to investigate the molecular dynamics of free GEM and graphene/GEM complexes in a watersalt medium. Afterwards, various parameters were investigated by utilizing trajectory files of both complexes acquired from simulation such as Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD), Radius of gyration (Rg), Solvent Accessible Surface Area (SASA) and Radial Distribution Function (RDF), to estimate the conformational change, stability and degree of rigidity and compactness of the simulated complexes (Lamichhane and Ghimire, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our simulation suggested that Cys481 was the most common mutated residue to affect the activity of BTK, and serve as the reason for acquired resistance to ibrutinib [ 28 ]. Further calculation of the radial distribution function (RDF) values highlighted the same residues, Met477 and Glu475, in the complex with reversible inhibitor ARQ531 and three residue pairs in the complex with an irreversible inhibitor, including Met477, Cys481, and Glu475 ( Figure 5 G,H) [ 29 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 150 Lamichhane et al not only ran MM/PBSA calculation but also used the analysis by dihedral angle distribution and radial distribution functions to confirm the strong interactions between inhibitor N3 and Mpro. 151 …”
Section: Methods and Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Sanjeev et al used MD simulations to study the impact of a crowded environment on drug–Mpro complexes, suggesting that crowding enhances the difference in the dynamics of apo- vs drug-bound complexes . Lamichhane et al not only ran MM/PBSA calculation but also used the analysis by dihedral angle distribution and radial distribution functions to confirm the strong interactions between inhibitor N3 and Mpro …”
Section: Methods and Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%