2016
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of seismic performance of pile‐supported models in liquefiable soils

Abstract: SUMMARYThe seismic performance of four pile-supported models is studied for two conditions: (i) transient to full liquefaction condition, i.e. the phase when excess pore pressure gradually increases during the shaking; (ii) full liquefaction condition, i.e. defined as the state where the seismically induced excess pore pressure equalises to the overburden stress. The paper describes two complementary analyses consisting of an experimental investigation, carried out at normal gravity on a shaking table, and a s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the important considerations is the change in dynamic performance due to the application of cyclic loading. This change may be significant in the presence of loose deposits, which may liquefy as a result of cyclic loadings [26,[35][36][37]. One of the ways to White noise testing was trialed because it offered the possibility of acquiring data at more frequent intervals during long-term tests due to its greater potential for automation over free vibration tests.…”
Section: Measurement Of Dynamic Response and Type 2 Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the important considerations is the change in dynamic performance due to the application of cyclic loading. This change may be significant in the presence of loose deposits, which may liquefy as a result of cyclic loadings [26,[35][36][37]. One of the ways to White noise testing was trialed because it offered the possibility of acquiring data at more frequent intervals during long-term tests due to its greater potential for automation over free vibration tests.…”
Section: Measurement Of Dynamic Response and Type 2 Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining the high seismicity with the soil characteristics (clay), a liquefaction risk exists 24,33,44,45 ; which is a process where the immersed sediments suffer a loss of resistance and let be a solid to become a viscous liquid. The measures to reduction the liquefaction risk consist in, for instance, soil replacement and intrusive retrofit methods.…”
Section: Soil Configurations and Interaction With Pilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maheshwari and Sarkar (2011) and Sarkar and Maheshwari (2012) used the Drucker-Prager soil model of work hardening to investigate the 3D behaviour of single piles and pile groups. Lombardi and Bhattacharya (2016) and Dash et al (2017) adopted a new set of p-y curves that can be obtained by modifying the conventional p-y curves (for non-liquefied soils) in such a way that replicates the strain hardening behaviour aforementioned. In this research, the non-linear spring stiffness (p-y curves) of the liquefied soil are used to evaluate soil-pile interaction analysis performed pile bending moments.…”
Section: P-y Curves For Modelling Liquefiable Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liquefaction happens when, during earthquake shaking, the pore water pressure of loosely deposited sandy soil layers increases rapidly and sufficiently and the effective stress in the soil can decrease to zero (Booth, 1994: p. 277). Collapse and damage of pile-supported structures due to liquefaction are still observed in many major earthquakes (Lombardi and Bhattacharya, 2016). The pile-supported structures' response to liquefiable soils during a major earthquake depends on the stiffness of the pile foundation, response of soil surrounding the pile and soil-pile interaction effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%