2017
DOI: 10.4236/jsea.2017.105026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Selected Control Programming Languages for Process Engineers by Means of Cognitive Effectiveness and Dimensions

Abstract: Different programming languages can be used for discrete, abstract and process-oriented programming. Depending on the application, there exist additional requirements, which are not fulfilled by every programming language. Flexible programming and maintainability are especially important requirements for process engineers. In this paper, the programming languages Activity Diagram, State Chart Diagram and Sequential Function Chart are compared and evaluated with regard to these requirements. This evaluation is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their study focused on new applications and was performed with a large group of participants consisting of both students and industrial practitioners. The visual language SFC was compared to the UML Activity Diagrams and State Charts in [17] with a focus on process technology, showing that Activity Diagrams are best suited for designing flexible and modular sequences. The study evaluated the languages based on the cognitive effectiveness, but does not include experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study focused on new applications and was performed with a large group of participants consisting of both students and industrial practitioners. The visual language SFC was compared to the UML Activity Diagrams and State Charts in [17] with a focus on process technology, showing that Activity Diagrams are best suited for designing flexible and modular sequences. The study evaluated the languages based on the cognitive effectiveness, but does not include experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%