2019
DOI: 10.5958/0974-181x.2019.00013.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Selected Invasive Alien Species via Bioprospecting as Potential Sources of Food Supplements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The protein content ranged from 7–13 % and the value obtained in this study was almost similar to the values of some underutilized green leafy vegetables reported by Gupta et al. (2005) and also to some edible invasive species of West Bengal, India reported by Datta et al. (2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The protein content ranged from 7–13 % and the value obtained in this study was almost similar to the values of some underutilized green leafy vegetables reported by Gupta et al. (2005) and also to some edible invasive species of West Bengal, India reported by Datta et al. (2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The protein content ranged from 7e13 % and the value obtained in this study was almost similar to the values of some underutilized green leafy vegetables reported by Gupta et al (2005) and also to some edible invasive species of West Bengal, India reported by Datta et al (2018). Foods which provide more than 12 % of their calorific value from proteins have been shown to be good source of proteins (Ali, 2009).…”
Section: Proximate Compositionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aunque en este estudio no se encontró diferencia en la cantidad de lípidos entre las plantas E1 y E2 (P>0.05), se ha reportado que la variación en el contenido de lípidos puede depender de la especie y de las condiciones ambientales en las que se encuentre la planta (30,34) . Así mismo, el contenido de proteína de las plantas E1 y E2 fue similar a lo encontrado en plantas de hortalizas de hoja verde (35) , y se ha reportado que la cantidad de proteína en las plantas puede depender del estado fisiológico, edad, condiciones ambientales y nutrientes presentes en el suelo (36) . Por otro lado, el contenido de P, Na y K fue mayor en la planta E1 con respecto a la planta E2 (P<0.05), mientras que, el contenido de Mg fue mayor en la planta E2 (P<0.05) y no se encontraron diferencias en el contenido de Ca entre ambas plantas (P>0.05) (Cuadro 2).…”
Section: Resultados Y Discusiónunclassified