2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of several electrolyte mixture-cathode material combinations in electrodeposition of americium radioisotopes for alpha-spectrometric measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…prepared by MPC method (50-63 keV FWHM). The lowest resolution for ED source preparation (from 31 keV to 41 keV FWHM) was obtained when using the sodium sulphate medium (NS), which is in agreement with the results obtained for electrodeposition of americium radioisotopes in the previous study (Krmpotić et al, 2017). The activity concentration results for 239 Pu, 241 Am and 244 Cm in a PT water sample (NPL 2015) also showed very good agreement comparing the obtained results by using different source preparation methods, and with the assigned values provided by the organizer (Table 4).…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…prepared by MPC method (50-63 keV FWHM). The lowest resolution for ED source preparation (from 31 keV to 41 keV FWHM) was obtained when using the sodium sulphate medium (NS), which is in agreement with the results obtained for electrodeposition of americium radioisotopes in the previous study (Krmpotić et al, 2017). The activity concentration results for 239 Pu, 241 Am and 244 Cm in a PT water sample (NPL 2015) also showed very good agreement comparing the obtained results by using different source preparation methods, and with the assigned values provided by the organizer (Table 4).…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Very low yield (only 28% total) was obtained when using the ASO electrolyte for ED, which in this case cannot be attributed to the radiochemical procedure used, due to the fact that all the samples were treated with the same radiochemical procedure up to the source preparation step, but suggests that the parameters for ED in this medium (Table 2) are most probably not optimal for Pu deposition. This was somewhat expected and is in accordance with the previous reported studies ( Lee and Pimpl, 1999;Oh et al, 2014), but was tested nevertheless due to the fact that lower concentrations of the chosen electrolyte's components were studied here, which previously proved to give higher deposition yields under lower currents (Krmpotić et al, 2017). To be able to quantitatively prepare plutonium sources in this medium, higher currents would be necessary.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations