Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Zirconia Bonded to Dentin After Various Surface Treatments of Zirconia

Reddy, Subash M.; Vijitha, D.; Deepak, T. G.; Balasubramanian, R.; Satish, A

doi:10.1007/s13191-012-0198-6

Cited by 16 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…15 Reddy et al showed that the application of a primer provides a stronger bond between zirconia and resin cement than sandblasting. 16 Thus, in this study, we did not perform sandblasting and only assessed the effect of the type of adhesive on the microshear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of two universal adhesives on microshear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia

Emamieh¹,

M²,

Ghasemi³

2019

Dent. Med. Probl.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Considering the increasing demand of patients for esthetic and durable restorations, zirconia, with its excellent mechanical properties, has overcome most of the limitations of all-ceramic restorations. However, bonding to zirconia is still challenging.Objectives. This study compared the effect of 2 universal adhesives on the microshear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia after 24 h and 6 months of water storage.Material and methods. This in vitro experimental study was performed on 56 zirconia (Prettau ® Zirconia) blocks, which were randomly divided into 2 groups. The Scotchbond TM Universal single-component adhesive and the All-Bond Universal TM 2-component adhesive were used. The PANAVIA TM F 2.0 resin cement was bonded to all samples, and they were stored in distilled water for 24 h and 6 months. The microshear bond strength test was then performed, and the data was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Results.After 24 h of water storage, the All-Bond samples showed significantly higher microshear bond strength than the Scotchbond samples (p < 0.001), but at 6 months, the microshear bond strength of Scotchbond was higher. The bond strength of All-Bond decreased after 6 months (p < 0.001), but no significant change occurred in the bond strength of the Scotchbond samples over time. Conclusions.The microshear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia depends on the type of adhesive and the duration of water storage. The Scotchbond Universal adhesive resulted in a stronger bond in the long term. Cite asEmamieh S, Elahi M, Ghasemi A. Effect of two universal adhesives on microshear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of two universal adhesives on microshear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia

Emamieh¹,

M²,

Ghasemi³

2019

Dent. Med. Probl.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, the sandblasting pressure was decreased in to 2 bar, and to 1 bar, since many authors recommended the use of low air pressure in sandblasting of the zirconia to avoid micro flaws and cracks creation which decreases the mechanical properties of zirconia and also may cause phase transformation of zirconia from the tetragonal to the monoclinic phase (24).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of different surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength of zirconia based restorations

AbdElaziz

Mohammed

Hamza

2018

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Statement of the Problem:Delamination of zirconia-veneered restoration is considered to be a very common failure in clinical practice. Therefore, using a chair side intra-oral repair option may be a simple alternative method to the total replacement of the restoration and may provide a clinically-acceptable and reliable immediate solution. Aim of the Study:This study evaluated the shear bond strength of two different repairing systems (CoJet and Ceramic repair N) of zirconia-based restorations and evaluated the effect of high and low sandblasting pressure on the shear bond strength between zirconia and composite resin. Materials and Methods:Thirty zirconia specimens were divided into two main groups according to the repairing systems: Group CJ: CoJet TM repairing system [chairside silica coating with 30 µm SiO 2 + silanization + adhesive] (3M ESPE) (15 specimens). Group CR: Ceramic Repair N system (Ivoclar Vivadent) [grinding with diamond stone + Monobond N universal primer adhesive] (15 specimens). Each group was further sub-divided into three sub-groups according to the surface treatment methods: Sub-groups (CJS 3, 2,1): CoJet Sandblasting at pressure 3,2,1 bar, Sub-group (CRG): Ceramic Repair Grinding with diamond stone and Sub-groups (CRS 2,1): Ceramic Repair Sandblasting with CoJet sand at pressure 2 and1 bar. Tetric N-ceram composite resin was polymerized on each conditioned specimen. The shear bond strength was tested using a universal testing machine, and fracture sites were examined with SEM. The data of bond strengths were statistically analyzed with two-way ANOVA.

show abstract

“…[ 9 ] Resin cement–zirconia bond can be improved through various methods such as the micromechanical means of airborne-particle abrasion[ 10 11 12 ] or chemical activation with specific monomers such as 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) and 4-methacryloxy ethyl trimellitic anhydride. [ 13 14 15 16 17 ]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of a zirconia primer on the shear bond strength of Y-TZP ceramic to three different core materials by using a self-adhesive resin cement

Giti

Zarkari

2019

J Indian Prosthodont Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: Considering the importance of bond strength of zirconia ceramic to different core materials, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of a new zirconia primer, a mixture of organophosphate and carboxylic acid monomers, on the bond strength of zirconia to three core materials cemented with a self-adhesive resin cement. Materials and Methods: The study was done on 36 disk-shaped zirconia specimens in the case (receiving new zirconia primer) and control groups ( n = 18) and three core material subgroups ( n = 6) (amalgam, nickel–chromium [Ni-Cr], and composite resin). A self-adhesive resin-based luting agent bonded the two parts together. The shear bond strength was tested and the facture modes were determined. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's honestly significant difference tests were used for data analyses (α = 0.05). Results: Zirconia primer could not significantly increase the bond strength of zirconia ceramic to different core materials ( P = 0.754). Composite resin and amalgam cores showed significantly higher bond strength than Ni-Cr core ( P = 0.001). On using zirconia primer, 100% of failures of composite resin cores were cohesive inside the core material, 75% in amalgam core and 100% in Ni-Cr core were adhesive. Conclusions: The use of new zirconia primer based on organophosphate/carboxylic acid monomers could not enhance the bond strength of zirconia ceramic to different core materials. The bond strength of zirconia to amalgam and composite resin cores was higher than that to Ni-Cr core material.

show abstract

Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Zirconia Bonded to Dentin After Various Surface Treatments of Zirconia

Cited by 16 publications

References 19 publications

Effect of two universal adhesives on microshear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia

Effect of two universal adhesives on microshear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia

Effect of different surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength of zirconia based restorations

The effect of a zirconia primer on the shear bond strength of Y-TZP ceramic to three different core materials by using a self-adhesive resin cement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About