Evaluation of shear strength in metallic brackets bonded to ceramic surface

Sandoval, Patricia C. Lima; Horliana, Anna C. Ratto Tempestini; Calheiros, Fernanda Calabró; Moura-Netto, Cacio; Gonçalves, Flávio de Oliveira; Santos, Ana Maria Antunes; Mello‐Moura, Anna Carolina Volpi

doi:10.23736/s0394-9508.19.04958-1

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The chosen adhesive protocol will influence the bond strength of brackets to ceramic surfaces. According to the results of the studies reviewed, ceramic surfaces treated with blasting aluminum oxide followed by Single Bond Universal™ application had an improved SBS and caused less cohesive damage to the ceramic [ 51 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: There has been an increase in demand for orthodontic treatment within the adult population, who likely receive restorative treatments using ceramic structures. The current state of the art regarding the most effective method to achieve an appropriate bond strength of brackets on ceramic surfaces isn’t consensual. This systematic review aims to compare the available surface treatments to ceramics and determine the one that allows to obtain the best bond strength. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO methodology was used, with the question “What is the most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic crowns or veneers?”. The research was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. In vitro and ex vivo studies were included. The methodological quality was evaluated using the guidelines for reporting of preclinical studies on dental materials by Faggion Jr. Results: A total of 655 articles searched in various databases were initially scrutinized. Sevety one articles were chosen for quality analysis. The risk of bias was considered medium to high in most studies. The use of hydrofluoric acid (HF), silane and laser afforded the overall best results. HF and HF plus laser achieved significantly highest bond strength scores in felsdphatic porcelain, while laser was the best treatment in lithium disilicate ceramics. Conclusions: The most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic is dependent on the type of ceramic.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%