2004
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2004.823543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Signal-to-Noise and Distortion Ratio Degradation in Nonlinear Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bussgang's Theorem [2,4] provides the theoretical support for this, since by correlating the output and input signals, we can estimate the effective signal component of the output, and thus by subtraction we can also obtain the uncorrelated part, which is in fact the output nonlinear distortion noise.…”
Section: Cochannel Distortion Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Bussgang's Theorem [2,4] provides the theoretical support for this, since by correlating the output and input signals, we can estimate the effective signal component of the output, and thus by subtraction we can also obtain the uncorrelated part, which is in fact the output nonlinear distortion noise.…”
Section: Cochannel Distortion Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…From (5) we can also see that the first term is the linear response, the second and third terms are the correlated part of the output signal (referring the input), 2 and the forth term is the nonlinear distortion correlation, usually called in [3,4] spectral regrowth, which unfortunately also has some correlated components with the linear part of the output. This is in fact one of the major problems of nonlinear systems, that is, how to identify the different signal component at the output.…”
Section: Cochannel Distortion Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, all the known methods for evaluating nonlinear distortion are very sensitive to the level of additive noise and rather inaccurate. To increase the accuracy in these evaluations, various methods have been proposed, in particular methods of regularization [6], introduction of parametric feedback [7] and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%