2006
DOI: 10.3137/ao.440302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of snow cover in CLASS for SnowMIP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since vertical profiles of snow physical properties are not resolved in CLASS and extinction of solar radiation mainly occurs near the surface of snow layers, parameterisations of snow microphysical processes need to account for unresolved processes in the snowpack. The Snow Model Intercomparison Project (SnowMIP) experiments have shown that the performance of CLASS for simulations of the seasonal evolution of snow on land is comparable to that of a multi-layer snowpack model (Brown et al, 2006) despite the use of a single layer of snow.…”
Section: Radiative and Snow Microphysical Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since vertical profiles of snow physical properties are not resolved in CLASS and extinction of solar radiation mainly occurs near the surface of snow layers, parameterisations of snow microphysical processes need to account for unresolved processes in the snowpack. The Snow Model Intercomparison Project (SnowMIP) experiments have shown that the performance of CLASS for simulations of the seasonal evolution of snow on land is comparable to that of a multi-layer snowpack model (Brown et al, 2006) despite the use of a single layer of snow.…”
Section: Radiative and Snow Microphysical Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative to CanAM4, there are many improvements to the simulation of snow. These include new formulations for vegetation interception of snow , for unloading snow from vegetation (Hedstrom and Pomeroy, 1998), for the albedo of snow-covered canopies (Bartlett and Verseghy, 2015), for limiting snow density as a function of depth (Tabler et al, 1997;Brown et al, 2006), and finally for the thermal conductivity of snow (Sturm et al, 1997). Water retention in snowpacks has also been incorporated.…”
Section: Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A snow scheme of this kind, named ISBAExplicit Snow (ES), is currently implemented in SURFEX, within the ISBA land surface model (Noilhan and Planton, 1989;Boone and Etchevers, 2001), and is used operationally for hydrological applications in MĂ©tĂ©o-France (Habets et al, 2008). Many intermediate complexity snowpacks schemes exist, such as JULES (Best et al, 2011), CLASS (Brown et al, 2006), the Community Land-surface Model (CLM) (Oleson et al, 2010), WEB-DHM (Shrestha et al, 2010), and Snow 17 (Anderson, 1976). Models of this kind have been recently implemented within NWP and Earth's system models such as HTESSEL (Dutra et al, 2010) and RACMO (Kuipers Munneke et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many studies have reported a tendency for CLASS to overestimate snow cover duration (Brown et al 2006;Langlois et al 2014;Langlois et al 2004). …”
Section: Land Surface Model: Class V36mentioning
confidence: 99%