2012
DOI: 10.2208/jscejge.68.163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Social Environmental Efficiency on Recycling of Construction Sludges as Ground Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the evaluation and comparison based on environmental economic efficiency performed in this study, (2) shows the environmental cost element to which we pay special attention. We apply (2) to the manufacturing of virgin materials, manufacturing of recycled materials and disposal.…”
Section: Quantification Of Environmental Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the evaluation and comparison based on environmental economic efficiency performed in this study, (2) shows the environmental cost element to which we pay special attention. We apply (2) to the manufacturing of virgin materials, manufacturing of recycled materials and disposal.…”
Section: Quantification Of Environmental Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We apply (2) to the manufacturing of virgin materials, manufacturing of recycled materials and disposal. Each element in (2) indicates the unit price of unit construction work.…”
Section: Quantification Of Environmental Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the previous studies regarding construction waste, they examined the environmental impact assessment and environmental accounting approach to evaluate recycling of construction waste by environmental economics in which environmental load converted to environment cost in addition to direct cost is considered (Kunibe et al 2007; Inazumi et al 2012). This study focuses on the extension of construction schedules caused by process delay brought about from processing for recycling that is one of the obstacles for recycling of construction waste.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%