2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of soil water content in tilled and cover-cropped olive orchards by the geoelectrical technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Relationships between averaged ECa and SWC values followed the exponential model; this type of relationship was observed in earlier works (Celano et al, 2011;McCutcheon et al, 2006;Mishra et al, 2014). This exponential relationship held at SWCs below 0.11 kg kg -1 , but was not applicable at higher water contents, possibly because of the presence of complex vertical distributions of soil water content in the wet soil.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Relationships between averaged ECa and SWC values followed the exponential model; this type of relationship was observed in earlier works (Celano et al, 2011;McCutcheon et al, 2006;Mishra et al, 2014). This exponential relationship held at SWCs below 0.11 kg kg -1 , but was not applicable at higher water contents, possibly because of the presence of complex vertical distributions of soil water content in the wet soil.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Previous studies on SWC in Calcisols are scarce in spite of being a common soil in agricultural Mediterranean landscapes. Celano et al (2011) assessed the spatial and temporal variability of SWC in olive orchards in Italy managed with and without cover crops. In Spain, Ramos et al (2011) studied the effect of four soil management practices on the water content levels in rainfed almond orchards and Fernández-Ugalde et al (2009) found in semiarid cultivated soils with barley an increase of water availability under no-tillage practice in comparison with conventional tillage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of performed studies stress the promising capabilities of the ERT‐technique, but the difficulties to interpret the measured electrical resistivity remain, certainly under field conditions. First, as the resistivity is affected by several factors, the variability of these factors needs to be restricted or measured independently and a fitting calibration equation needs to be established (Michot et al, 2003; Celano et al, 2011; Garré et al, 2011). Second, possibly rapid changes in the plant‐soil continuum, such as a passing infiltration front after heavy rain or a tracer pulse, require high temporal resolution of the measurement to avoid temporal smearing (e.g., Koestel et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%