1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199906)27:5<231::aid-jcu2>3.0.co;2-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of solid breast lesions with power Doppler sonography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
62
3
7

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
62
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, ultrasonography (US) and mammography are the most frequently used non-invasive methods for detecting breast cancer [1][2][3], while Doppler techniques may be used in parallel to provide additional information [4,5] and obtain better diagnostic accuracy [6,7]. Complementary to these methods, elastography adds supplementary information regarding differences in elasticity and stiffness between different tissues [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Currently, ultrasonography (US) and mammography are the most frequently used non-invasive methods for detecting breast cancer [1][2][3], while Doppler techniques may be used in parallel to provide additional information [4,5] and obtain better diagnostic accuracy [6,7]. Complementary to these methods, elastography adds supplementary information regarding differences in elasticity and stiffness between different tissues [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…For the quantification of tumor vascularization, we used power Doppler sonography as a method developed in vivo in small animals. Power Doppler sonography was used for the first time in human breast tumor studies 20 years ago and has been validated in providing overall assessment of tumor vascularization (30). This noninvasive technique offers many advantages, such as high sensitivity, simplicity of use, and repeatability (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(17) Since PDUS measures the amplitude of blood flow, it is angle-independent and avoids aliasing artefacts. (18,19) Although PDUS has shown great potential in predicting malignancy, (16,19,20) its use is limited by the lack of standard interpretation guidelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%