Evaluation of Strategic Initiatives with MCDA for Issuing Natural Disaster Alerts

Silva, Glayse Ferreira Perroni da; Belderrain, Mischel Carmen Neyra

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23816-2_87

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, this work proposes to structure a multicriteria decision model that supports definition and prioritization of strategic initiatives that can contribute to the accomplishment of the Cemaden's organizational objective. The present study is an extended version of the paper entitled "Evaluation of Strategic Initiatives with MCDA for Issuing Natural Disaster Alerts" (Silva and Belderrain, 2019), which was presented at the Production and Operations Management Society (POMS) Conference, in 2018.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prioritization of strategic initiatives in the context of natural disaster prevention

Silva

Belderrain

2019

BJO&PM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Goal: The purpose of this paper is to build the structure of a multicriteria decision model that supports definition and prioritization of strategic initiatives by an institution performing in the prevention of natural disasters. Design/Methodology/Approach: The Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methodological process is adopted to build a multicriteria evaluation model. A two-phase process is followed, employing a top-down approach, based on Value-Focused Thinking (VFT), in combination with the Multi Attribute Value Theory (MAVT) method. The participants of the MCDA process were experts of the control room in the case study institution. Results: The proposed methodology not only helped decision makers to enumerate a number of strategic initiatives to accomplish the organizational objective, but also helped them to establish a structured procedure to prioritize these initiatives. Limitations: Absence of a criterion related to the organization budget in the model; limited scope of participation in the process; absence of quantitative criteria. Practical implications: The major practical contributions are as follows: an structured model that supports the strategic planning process; a better allocation of resources (human, financial, and materials) in projects that are truly aligned with the strategic objective of the organization; the organizational learning coming from the exercise of reflection on values, objectives and preferences; and the legitimacy of decisions as a result of the participative character of the construction process of the model. Originality/Value: In this study, a multicriteria evaluation model is structured and applied as support for strategic decision making in the context of a natural disaster early warning system. The model has a significant application potential, since it encourages the adoption of structured decision support methods rather than traditional empirical decision making. Thus, the value of the study lies in the contribution that the proposed model can offer to more effective disaster prevention.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%