2010
DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-10541-2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of stratocumulus cloud prediction in the Met Office forecast model during VOCALS-REx

Abstract: Abstract.Observations in the subtropical southeast Pacific obtained during the VOCALS-REx field experiment are used to evaluate the representation of stratocumulus cloud in the Met Office forecast model and to identify key areas where model biases exist. Marked variations in the large scale structure of the cloud field were observed during the experiment on both day-to-day and on diurnal timescales. In the remote maritime region the model is shown to have a good representation of synoptically induced variabili… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
69
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
15
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with several previous investigations, such as Wyant et al (2010), Abel et al (2010), Yang et al (2011. The observed top of the approximately well-mixed boundary layer is between 1 and 1.5 km, but the model predicts the depth of between 0.5 and 1 km.…”
Section: Model Evaluation and Sensitivitysupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is consistent with several previous investigations, such as Wyant et al (2010), Abel et al (2010), Yang et al (2011. The observed top of the approximately well-mixed boundary layer is between 1 and 1.5 km, but the model predicts the depth of between 0.5 and 1 km.…”
Section: Model Evaluation and Sensitivitysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although there was a significant variability of the observed profiles (the largest for the horizontal velocity components within the boundary layer), the variability does not explain the systematic differences in the boundary layer height between the observations and simulations. Overall, significant underprediction of the height is consistent with previous limited-area simulations of cloud-topped marine boundary layer (e.g., Wyant et al, 2010;Abel et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2011). In our case, the underprediction results from a combination of two factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MetUM simulated a good representation of synoptically induced variability in cloud cover and boundary layer depth during the VOCALS-REx (Abel et al, 2010). However, the exclusion of cloud-aerosol interactions and the model's relatively simple parameterization of cloud-microphysical effects are likely to preclude better agreement with field observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent modeling exercise by Abel et al (2010) using the UK Met Office Unified Model (MetUM) is parallel to this model evaluation study. MetUM simulated a good representation of synoptically induced variability in cloud cover and boundary layer depth during the VOCALS-REx (Abel et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%