Evaluation of stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of stainless steel 304L with surface nanocrystallization by small punch test

Bai, Tao; Chen, Peng; Guan, Kaishu

doi:10.1016/j.msea.2012.10.071

Cited by 41 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Annealing was reported to improve corrosion resistance of nanocrystalline surface. Most recently, stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of nanocrystalline SS produced by SMAT [226,227] was found to higher than that of its coarse grained counterpart and this behaviour was attributed to the defects induced by SMAT process.…”

Section: Nanocrystalline Stainless Steel Produced By Cavitationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) susceptibility of fine microstructure generated by various machining [262][263][264] or intentionally [227] developed nanocrystalline structures was analysed and it was found that a nanocrystalline structure was more susceptible to SCC. However, SCC susceptibility seemed to be induced by the micro cracks generated during processing.…”

Section: Prospects and Gapsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The influence of nanocrystalline structure and processing route on corrosion of stainless steel: A review

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Nanocrystalline Stainless Steel Produced By Cavitationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Prospects and Gapsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The influence of nanocrystalline structure and processing route on corrosion of stainless steel: A review

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Within the 300-series austenitic stainless steels, the 304 grade is the most commonly used due to its superior low temperature toughness, as well as its corrosion resistance [ 3 ]. Recently there has been an enormous amount of research addressing the improvement of the mechanical properties of austenitic stainless steel [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ] without lowering corrosion resistance [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Many experimental studies have focused on AISI 304 and AISI 304L at elevated temperatures [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], under thermo-mechanical and cycle fatigue conditions [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], under creep conditions [ 23 ] and ductility loss of hydrogen-charged steel [ 24 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Size on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of an AISI 304L Stainless Steel—A Comparison between Bulk and Fibers

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this work, the mechanical properties and microstructural features of an AISI 304L stainless steel in two presentations, bulk and fibers, were systematically studied in order to establish the relationship among microstructure, mechanical properties, manufacturing process and effect on sample size. The microstructure was analyzed by XRD, SEM and TEM techniques. The strength, Young’s modulus and elongation of the samples were determined by tensile tests, while the hardness was measured by Vickers microhardness and nanoindentation tests. The materials have been observed to possess different mechanical and microstructural properties, which are compared and discussed.

show abstract

“…The cracks can initiate at any spot after a localized corrosion formed at severe corrosive conditions with the presence of chloride ions and where the net of tensile residual stresses is highest. Besides that, an increase in cold work also increases the stress corrosion cracking (SCC) susceptibility by approximately 40% [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Study on the Effect of Surface Grinding on Chloride Induced Pitting Initiation of Austenitic Stainless Steel 304 under Thermal Insulation at Ambient Temperature

Sivanathan¹

2018

J Material Sci Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The investigation was carried out to study the effect of surface grinding on chloride induced stress corrosion cracking (CISCC) of austenitic stainless steels 304 at ambient temperature condition. The U-bend tests with thickness 13 mm as per ASTM G 30 were used to investigate the effect of surface grinding on chloride induced stress corrosion cracking (CISCC) of austenitic stainless steel 304 in a corrosive atmosphere containing sodium chloride at ambient temperature. At a high level of tensile residual stress had developed the pits on U-bend specimen surface at ambient temperature with the presence of low to high chloride concentration level. The experimental results recommend that develop a proper metallurgical fabrication criteria, specification, and procedures for pressure vessels to avoid a recurrence in future.

show abstract

Evaluation of stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of stainless steel 304L with surface nanocrystallization by small punch test

Cited by 41 publications

References 50 publications

The influence of nanocrystalline structure and processing route on corrosion of stainless steel: A review

The influence of nanocrystalline structure and processing route on corrosion of stainless steel: A review

Influence of Size on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of an AISI 304L Stainless Steel—A Comparison between Bulk and Fibers

A Study on the Effect of Surface Grinding on Chloride Induced Pitting Initiation of Austenitic Stainless Steel 304 under Thermal Insulation at Ambient Temperature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About