2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2011.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of stucco binder for agglomeration in the heap leaching of copper ore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial crack network in the particles comminuted by HPGR increases during the leaching process, which splits each single particles to two or more new ore particles and produces a particles size distribution different to the initial reactor feed. particles and deposited at local areas and an extremely small amount of fine particles are transported out of the reactor by the solution (Kodali et al, 2011, Yang et al, 2008. Since in this study the solution reagent was introduced to the leach reactors from the bottom and there were basket frames at different level inside the leach reactors (Ghorbani et al, 2011d), there was no fine particles transportation out of the reactor.…”
Section: Effect Of Hpgr Product On Percolation Of Heap Leachingmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The initial crack network in the particles comminuted by HPGR increases during the leaching process, which splits each single particles to two or more new ore particles and produces a particles size distribution different to the initial reactor feed. particles and deposited at local areas and an extremely small amount of fine particles are transported out of the reactor by the solution (Kodali et al, 2011, Yang et al, 2008. Since in this study the solution reagent was introduced to the leach reactors from the bottom and there were basket frames at different level inside the leach reactors (Ghorbani et al, 2011d), there was no fine particles transportation out of the reactor.…”
Section: Effect Of Hpgr Product On Percolation Of Heap Leachingmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It is known that the presence of excess fines in heap leaching operations may cause low recovery due to reduced heap permeability and/or channelling of lixiviant flow. These problems are mitigated to some extent by agglomeration pre-treatment prior to heap leaching (Kodali et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2008). In this work, the feed material to the leach reactors had the same selection of the sieve ranges for both the HPGR and cone crusher tests.…”
Section: Effect Of Hpgr Product On Percolation Of Heap Leachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial crack network in the particles increases during the leaching process, which splits each single particle into two or more new ore particles and produces a particles size distribution different to the initial reactor feed (Ghorbani et al, 2013b). However, after leaching, under the coupled action of multiple factors, such as hydraulic power, gravity and chemical reactions, newly generated fine particles flow downwards through the pore space among coarse particles and deposited at local areas and an extremely small amount of fine particles are transported out of the reactor by the solution (Kodali et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2008). The most fundamentally important aspect of heap leaching is permeability of the leach and even percolation of the lixivant solution throughout all the ore.…”
Section: Effect Of the Clay Minerals On Percolation Of The Heap Leachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the influence of average grade of feed on concentration recovery has been evaluated (Nakhaei et al, 2012), no specific results have been obtained from the effect of average grade of feed on the heap leaching recovery. As there are several effective parameters on leaching recovery (Maley et al, 2009;Norris et al, 2010;Kodali et al, 2011), the effect of average grade of feed on leaching recovery hasn't been clearly specified yet. However, this can be assessed by laboratory tests for a specific mine and it can be added to studies related to cut-off grades.…”
Section: Average Grades and Process Recoveriesmentioning
confidence: 99%