2012
DOI: 10.5296/ije.v4i4.2491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Student Teachers Grouped According to Teaching Subjects: Students’ Perception

Abstract: The purpose of this paper was to test if there was a significant difference between students' evaluation of their student teachers grouped according to teaching subjects. It also tested if there was a significant difference between evaluation of student teachers grouped according to teaching subjects in the following areas: preparation, supervision, teaching environment, and teaching practice experience. To test the hypotheses, Pearson's product measurement correlation coefficient and t-test were applied. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification not only affects the disciplines but also results in significant differences in academic literacy among students in different fields. This study found that compared to STEM disciplines (such as natural science, engineering, agriculture, medicine, and management), the six traditional humanities disciplines, namely philosophy, law, education, literature, history, and economics, showed extremely significant differences in perceived usefulness (PU), which may be due to the difference in teaching style between humanities and STEM (Tuimur et al, 2012) and the peer cultural influence within the humanities. A study of nearly 500,000 online courses in the state of Washington in the United States has similar conclusions that students face greater difficulties in online learning in fields like English and social sciences, possibly due to the existence of "negative peer effects" in the online courses of these disciplines (Lv et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The classification not only affects the disciplines but also results in significant differences in academic literacy among students in different fields. This study found that compared to STEM disciplines (such as natural science, engineering, agriculture, medicine, and management), the six traditional humanities disciplines, namely philosophy, law, education, literature, history, and economics, showed extremely significant differences in perceived usefulness (PU), which may be due to the difference in teaching style between humanities and STEM (Tuimur et al, 2012) and the peer cultural influence within the humanities. A study of nearly 500,000 online courses in the state of Washington in the United States has similar conclusions that students face greater difficulties in online learning in fields like English and social sciences, possibly due to the existence of "negative peer effects" in the online courses of these disciplines (Lv et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%