2019
DOI: 10.1504/ijsem.2019.103183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of students' satisfaction with perceived performance value projection in Malaysian private higher education institutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Addressing the issue of quality and producing graduates with global competitiveness is essential to bring about systemic changes in the educational system (Laguador, Dotong, & De Castro, 2014). Higher education institutions must offer productive and innovative solutions to attract and retain students and establish meaningful relationships with them (Ganesh, Haslinda, & Raghavan, 2017). These institutions recruit and train highly qualified academics to ensure that graduates meet the highest competency standards across various subjects, thereby distinguishing themselves from the competition (Darling-Hammond, 2010).…”
Section: Organizational Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addressing the issue of quality and producing graduates with global competitiveness is essential to bring about systemic changes in the educational system (Laguador, Dotong, & De Castro, 2014). Higher education institutions must offer productive and innovative solutions to attract and retain students and establish meaningful relationships with them (Ganesh, Haslinda, & Raghavan, 2017). These institutions recruit and train highly qualified academics to ensure that graduates meet the highest competency standards across various subjects, thereby distinguishing themselves from the competition (Darling-Hammond, 2010).…”
Section: Organizational Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, students enter an educational institution with background characteristics, particularly family background, individual character, aptitude, and motivation (Ganesh et al, 2017;Raghavan & Ganesh, 2015;Bergamo et al, 2012). When the student interacts in the environment, the commitments and intentions to stay in the respective institution develop (Bergamo et al, 2012;Tinto, 1993).…”
Section: Tinto's Interactionist Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pursuing excellence in service delivery performance with students' academic and social integration as a key factor will contribute to a sustainable competitive advantage. However, in Malaysia, the value factor is not revealed clearly because most of the value proposition was driven by the measurement based on technical quality inputs and students' outputs compared to value-driven such as students' academic and social integration for satisfaction and retention (Trong et al, 2016;Ganesh et al 2017;Ideris et al 2016;Ibraheem, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%