2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of surface diffusion in microporous/mesoporous media using a numerical model applied to rate-of-adsorption data: Implications for improved gas permeability estimation in shales/tight rocks using drill cuttings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This schematic illustrates that gas can diffuse into the kerogen and be absorbed by kerogen. Yang et al 119 used accessible horizontal wells drill cuttings to integrate experimental and simulation works to evaluate the permeability and surface diffusion. Their work examined the importance of surface diffusion in various adsorbate/adsorbent procedures.…”
Section: Gas-eor Mechanism In Shale/tightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This schematic illustrates that gas can diffuse into the kerogen and be absorbed by kerogen. Yang et al 119 used accessible horizontal wells drill cuttings to integrate experimental and simulation works to evaluate the permeability and surface diffusion. Their work examined the importance of surface diffusion in various adsorbate/adsorbent procedures.…”
Section: Gas-eor Mechanism In Shale/tightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective micropore diffusivity is from 2.13 × 10 –7 to 7.65 × 10 –5 s –1 , which is also comparable to the effective micropore diffusivity from the literature (2.3 × 10 –7 to 2.37 × 10 –5 s –1 ). , Moreover, CO 2 diffusivity is larger than CH 4 diffusivity under the same pressure step. The faster CO 2 diffusion rate in the coal matrix is closely related to the higher adsorption energy and smaller kinetic diameter of CO 2 over CH 4 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that apparent diffusivity through the nanopore structure is influenced by intrinsic properties, such as the coal rank and macrolithotype, , and external factors, such as the gas type and moisture. , At the initial pressure stage (<2.5 MPa), Knudsen diffusion plays a critical role in the mesopore range, and the predominance of Knudsen diffusion enhances the influence of the coal pore morphology on the whole diffusion process . However, the transition from mesopore to micropore decreases the bulk diffusion and strengthens the surface diffusion . Therefore, diffusion of gases in the coal matrix closely correlates to the coal pore morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Immiscible fluid displacement path, controlled by the fluid viscosity ratio and capillary numbers, has significant influences on the efficiencies in the oil recovery and reservoir development. Over the past decade, much effort has been made to study the immiscible displacement paths and control factors of tight oil reservoirs using simulation and experimental methods. In particular, many pore-scale studies have indicated that the transfer across the fluid–fluid interface is primarily controlled by the relative magnitude of viscous stress and capillary force. Lenormand et al first investigated the effect of the competition of capillary forces and viscous stress on immiscible displacement fluid paths in two-dimensional micromodels. Capillary number ( Ca ), which is a function of the displacement speed, contact angle, and viscosity ratio, can characterize the effect of these forces on immiscible displacement processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%