Evaluation of surface roughness of different direct resin-based composites

Magdy, Nashaat M.; Kola, Mohammed Zaheer; Alqahtani, Hamod Hussain; Alqahtani, Mubarak Daghash; Alghmlas, Abdullah Saud

doi:10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_72_17

Cited by 25 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Overall, 2D and 3D qualitative analysis coincided with quantitative data for both BF composites and F/P systems in the included studies [ 21 , 22 , 24 , 25 , 29 , 30 ].…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 61%

“…In contrast, four studies performed dry F/P [ 23 , 25 , 26 , 31 ]. Two studies performed wet finishing and dry polishing [ 22 , 29 ]. Both wet and dry F/P, were performed with different systems in the same study [ 27 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to the parameters considered in the analysis, four studies presented a medium-risk of bias [ 22 , 24 , 27 , 29 ], whereas eight investigations showed a high-risk of bias [ 20 , 21 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 30 , 31 ]. The risk of bias graph and summary are illustrated in Figure 2 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microbial Adhesion of Bulk Fill Composites: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Ismail

Ali

2023

fid

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: This paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of different finishing and polishing (F/P) systems on surface roughness (SR) and microbial adhesion to bulk fill (BF) composites. Materials and Methods: An electronic search of 3 databases (the National Library of Medicine [MEDLINE/PubMed], Scopus, and ScienceDirect) was conducted. Only in vitro studies that evaluated SR and microbial adhesion to BF composites were included. The included studies were individually evaluated for the risk of bias following predetermined criteria. A meta-analysis of the reviewed studies was conducted to compare the SR values of both Filtek Bulk Fill and Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill with and without F/P using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Results: A total of 12 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between Filtek Bulk Fill and Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill without F/P or after F/P using multi-step systems. Different F/P systems affected the SR values, on the other hand, did not affect microbial adhesion values. Conclusion: Both Filtek Bulk Fill and Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill had comparable roughness results. Multi-step systems may be preferable for F/P of BF composites.

show abstract

“…Overall, 2D and 3D qualitative analysis coincided with quantitative data for both BF composites and F/P systems in the included studies [ 21 , 22 , 24 , 25 , 29 , 30 ].…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 61%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microbial Adhesion of Bulk Fill Composites: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Ismail

Ali

2023

fid

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Surface roughness is one of the important parameters that affects the clinical performance and longevity of the composite restoration [ 8 ]. Resin composites are highly demanded by patients due to aesthetic concerns and are hence widely employed [ 9 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Analysis of the Surface Roughness of Class V Composite Restorations Using a Conventional Polishing System and Pre-contoured Cervical Matrices: An In Vitro Study

Sandeep A,

Bhandari

et al. 2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Rough surfaces of restorations have an impact on the accumulation of plaque, unaesthetic contour, and marginal adaptation, thereby affecting their functional, aesthetic, and clinical performance and the long-term stability of the restoration. Several polishing systems are currently in use for composite restorations, but information on their impact on surface roughness is limited. The present study aimed to determine the surface roughness of class V composite restorations polished using pre-contoured cervical matrices and to compare it with a conventional disc polishing system. Materials and methods: Twenty maxillary anterior teeth were collected and used in the study. Class V cavity preparation was done, and the cavities were restored with two types of composites (microhybrid and nanohybrid) from commercially available brands (Ivoclar and Dentsply) and finished and polished using two polishing systems (super-snap and pre-contoured cervical matrices). The evaluation of surface roughness was done using an atomic force microscope (AFM). Results: The surface roughness parameters (Ra-arithmetic mean/average line roughness and Sa-average surface roughness) of the class V cavities restored using pre-contoured cervical matrices were significantly lower for both the tested resin composites. Conclusion: The surface roughness of Class V cavities restored using pre-contoured cervical matrix systems was significantly less for both microhybrid and nanohybrid composites.

show abstract

“…The effect of antibacterial agents of composite resin materials in dental caries prevention and reduction of flexural strength of the material: Systematic review and meta-analysis to other materials, [6][7][8][9][10] which can lead to secondary caries [11][12][13] Micro gaps (microleakage) between the prepared cavity and the filling material can be considered a reason for secondary caries 14 It is reported that replacement of old fillings accounts for about two-thirds of the services offered in operative dentistry; such a high rate of failure suggests that operative approaches are not optimum and there is potential for improvement in this area. 15 Moreover, in the structure-preservation approach, which is regarded as a conservative strategy for caries removal, it is expected that more bacteria remain in the affected dentine.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of antibacterial agents of composite resin materials in dental caries prevention and reduction of flexural strength of the material: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Nilchian,

Mosayebi,

Tarrahi

et al. 2022

Journal of Oral Health and Oral Epidemiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The present study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial agents of composite resin materials, their efficacy in caries prevention, and their impact on the mechanical properties (flexural strength) of composite resin restorative materials. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, all published articles on the effects of antibacterial properties of composite resin materials in the prevention of dental caries (between 2005 to 2020) were evaluated using valid databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, ISI, Scopus, Cochrane, ProQuest, and Embase, found by searching the keywords "anti-bacterial agents," "composite resins," "dental restoration," and "dental caries" according to the MeSH system. The context of the studies was extracted and subjected to modified CONSORT. The required data were extracted and analyzed with the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Results: According to the results of the random effect model, the heterogeneity of biofilm colony forming unit (CFU) average was -1.90 (CI: -1.68 to -2.13). The mean value of the control group was higher than the intervention. The heterogeneity of flexural strength (FS) average was -11.92 (CI: -8.30 to -15.55). The mean value of the control group was higher than the intervention group. The heterogeneity of thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) absorbance average was -0.90 (CI: -0.65 to -1.14). The mean value of the control group was higher than the intervention group. Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that the antibacterial agents had a significant effect on the caries prevention properties of the composite resin materials; however, due to the bias related to different control groups, laboratory conditions, and mismatch between in vitro and in vivo conditions, more studies are needed in this regard.

show abstract

Evaluation of surface roughness of different direct resin-based composites

Cited by 25 publications

References 20 publications

The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microbial Adhesion of Bulk Fill Composites: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microbial Adhesion of Bulk Fill Composites: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Comparative Analysis of the Surface Roughness of Class V Composite Restorations Using a Conventional Polishing System and Pre-contoured Cervical Matrices: An In Vitro Study

The effect of antibacterial agents of composite resin materials in dental caries prevention and reduction of flexural strength of the material: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About