2004
DOI: 10.1086/503501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Surgical-Site Infections Following Cardiovascular Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decreases in glycopeptide use were 31% for period 2 and 59% for period 3, relative to period 1. In our study, the expenditure for glycopeptides included the total amount of glycopeptides used for the following reasons: (1) treatment of MRSA infection, (2) treatment of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococcus infection, (3) prophylaxis for patients admitted from other settings and undergoing revision surgery, (4) de-escalation therapy for patients with high fever, and (5) inappropriate use of glycopeptides by some consulting doctors from other settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decreases in glycopeptide use were 31% for period 2 and 59% for period 3, relative to period 1. In our study, the expenditure for glycopeptides included the total amount of glycopeptides used for the following reasons: (1) treatment of MRSA infection, (2) treatment of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococcus infection, (3) prophylaxis for patients admitted from other settings and undergoing revision surgery, (4) de-escalation therapy for patients with high fever, and (5) inappropriate use of glycopeptides by some consulting doctors from other settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%