2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0035-9203(00)90308-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of surveillance thresholds for prediction of meningitis epidemics using ongoing surveillance data at the district level, in Niger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at least in some regions, the timing of onset and peak has been associated with the amplitude of epidemics (de Chabalier et al 2000). Several studies have related anomalies in amplitude to anomalies in climate.…”
Section: The Role Of Climate and Dustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at least in some regions, the timing of onset and peak has been associated with the amplitude of epidemics (de Chabalier et al 2000). Several studies have related anomalies in amplitude to anomalies in climate.…”
Section: The Role Of Climate and Dustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7]20 Furthermore, ability of low thresholds to predict an epidemic improved early in the meningitis season, in the absence of a recent epidemic and in areas of population greater than 50 000. An epidemic was arbitrarily defined as an annual incidence of at least 100 cases per 100 000 inhabitants to enable comparison with other studies, 5,6,15 but threshold specificity was higher for predicting smaller, clinically important outbreaks. 11,21 In sparsely populated areas, small changes in the number of cases could cause major incidence fluctuations, and poor access to laboratory services might make bacterial identification difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][10][11][12][13] Furthermore, the recommendation based on data collected in health facilities 5 did not account for under-reporting of cases through surveillance. The proposed threshold, therefore, has several disadvantages: it does not detect all epidemics; 5,6,15 it does not allow time to implement mass vaccination; 6 and its effectiveness is highly dependent on the quality of surveillance. 16 Detection of epidemic meningitis in areas of fewer than 30 000 inhabitants was not addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The epidemic threshold that has been considered to be most appropriate (based, initially, on the analysis of an epidemic in Burkina Faso) is 15 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per week during two consecutive weeks [1,5]. The threshold has subsequently been revised as more data from different situations has been accumulated [73][74][75][76]. The reliability of epidemiological data, which depend on population size of communities, is an important factor in the reliability of threshold determination, and modern approaches introduce the concept of two levels of thresholds: alert and action.…”
Section: Control Of Epidemicsmentioning
confidence: 99%