Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review

Moraschini, Vittório; Poubel, Luiz Augusto; Ferreira, Vı́tor F.; Barboza, Eliane Porto

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.023

Cited by 540 publications

(424 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

391

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…9 Bugüne kadar dental implant uygulamalarının başarı ve başarısızlık oranları birçok farklı kritere göre değerlendirilmiştir. 12 Yapılan derlemelerde, dental implant tedavisinin 5 yıllık başarısının %95' ten fazla olduğu gösterilmektedir. 13 Sistemik hastalıkların dental implant tedavisi üzerindeki etkileri net değildir, çünkü konu ile ilgili bugüne kadar yayınlanan kontrollü randomize çalışma sayısı oldukça azdır.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Farkli Dental İmplantlarin Başari Oranlarinin Geri̇ye Dönük Olarak Değerlendi̇ri̇lmesi̇

ADALI¹,

YÜCE²,

GÜNBAY³

et al. 2018

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionunclassified

Farkli Dental İmplantlarin Başari Oranlarinin Geri̇ye Dönük Olarak Değerlendi̇ri̇lmesi̇

ADALI¹,

YÜCE²,

GÜNBAY³

et al. 2018

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Such method of treating the patients with symptoms of partial and full adentia, according to previous studies, usually exceeds 90% level of success [5][6][7][8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Peri-Implant Bone Reduction Levels from Superimposition Perspective: Pilot Study among Ukrainian Implantology Practice

Goncharuk-Khomyn

Keniuk

2018

Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the possibility and efficiency of using adapted peri-implant bone evaluation method based on the principle of graphical superimposition and compare it to the possibilities of using sagittal sections of CBCT results to register the dynamics of peri-implant bone changes during the first year of implant functioning. Material and Methods: 108 pairs of DICOM data sets were selected and pre-anonymized and coded in Planmeca Romexis ® Viewer software. Each pair of datasets consisted of a CBCT file, obtained immediately after the installation of a dental implant, and one year after its operation. The first method of peri-implant bone changes evaluation was carried out by analyzing the sagittal sections of the CBCT data from the mesial and distal sides of the implant. The second method was followed by original algorithm, which included specific steps of superimposition of graphical images. Results: Superimposition method helped to establish volumetric parameter of circular bone reduction around dental implants after 1 year of their functioning. Such average values for the maxillary distal implants were 3.547 mm3, maxillary frontal implants -3.118 mm3, mandibular distal implants -2.614 mm3, mandibular frontal implants -2.456 mm 3. Correlation values between averages of vertical bone loss parameters and volumetric bone loss parameters riches r=0.954. Among all patients the highest peri-implant bone reduction rates were observed in the distal and frontal areas of the maxilla, even though statistical difference among such parameters of implants installed at the areas of mandible and maxilla was not significant (p > 0.05). Such observation was established during the analysis of results obtained both by digital sagittal cross section from CBCT results and by superimposition method. Conclusion: Using the superimposition principle allows us to evaluate the individual indicator of volumetric bone loss at the peri-implant region. The possibility of taking into account the parameters of bone tissue volume reduction, instead of just geometrical parameter of bone height, allows to individualize the parameters of bone loss among patients of different prosthetic rehabilitation group.

show abstract

“…Several studies have reported implant survival rates after superstructure placement [1,2]. Other studies have reported on the utility of narrow-diameter implants in the anterior or premolar region [3,4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An examination of the cumulative survival rate of narrow-diameter dental implants in the mandibular molar region: a retrospective cohort study

Nagahisa¹,

Arai²,

Baba³

2017

Dent Oral Craniofac Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review

Cited by 540 publications

References 54 publications

Farkli Dental İmplantlarin Başari Oranlarinin Geri̇ye Dönük Olarak Değerlendi̇ri̇lmesi̇

Farkli Dental İmplantlarin Başari Oranlarinin Geri̇ye Dönük Olarak Değerlendi̇ri̇lmesi̇

Evaluation of Peri-Implant Bone Reduction Levels from Superimposition Perspective: Pilot Study among Ukrainian Implantology Practice

An examination of the cumulative survival rate of narrow-diameter dental implants in the mandibular molar region: a retrospective cohort study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About