Evaluation of Suspected Cosmetic Induced Facial Dermatoses with the Use of Indian Standard Series and Cosmetic Series Patch Test

Rastogi, Madhur Kant

doi:10.7860/jcdr/2015/9714.5722

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As the only one of the selected substances, PPD is being tested routinely in baseline series all over the world for many decades, usually at 1% pet., or as TRUE Test allergen at 80 μg/cm 2 . Thereby, the literature search, which had been formulated sensitively to allow identification of all relevant articles, yielded a vast number of studies 10–96 . These did not (only) include hairdressers, but can serve as background information on the general prevalence of PPD contact allergy.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic review on skin adverse effects of important hazardous hair cosmetic ingredients with a focus on hairdressers

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The burden of occupational hand eczema in hairdressers is high, and (partly strong) allergens abound in the hair cosmetic products they use.Objectives: To systematically review published evidence concerning contact allergy to an indicative list of active ingredients of hair cosmetics, namely, p-phenylenediamine (PPD), toluene-2,5-diamine (PTD), persulfates, mostly ammonium persulfate (APS), glyceryl thioglycolate (GMTG), and ammonium thioglycolate (ATG), concerning the prevalence of sensitization, particularly in terms of a comparison (relative risk; RR) between hairdressers and non-hairdressers.Methods: Following a PROSPERO-registered and published protocol, eligible literature published from 2000 to February 2021 was identified, yielding 322 publications, and extracted in standardized publication record forms, also considering risk of bias.Results: Based on 141 publications, the contact allergy prevalence to PPD was 4.3% (95% CI: 3.8-4.9%) in consecutively patch tested patients. Other ingredients were mostly tested in an aimed fashion, yielding variable, and partly high contact allergy prevalences. Where possible, the RR was calculated, yielding an average increased sensitization risk in hairdressers of between 5.4 (PPD) and 3.4 (ATG). Additional evidence related to immediate-type hypersensitivity, experimental results, exposures, and information from case reports was qualitatively synthesized.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic review on skin adverse effects of important hazardous hair cosmetic ingredients with a focus on hairdressers

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Out of a total number of 3016 allergen patches applied in our study, positive reactions were obtained in 1.92% (58/3016) patches compared to 3.2%, 3.75%, and 2.38% in previous studies. [ 6 7 12 ] The higher frequency of patch-test positivity in the other studies could be because those studies were conducted in larger urban centers where the use of cosmetics is more common, especially among women.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Rastogi et al . [ 12 ] had found the forehead as the most common site (50%) followed by the periorbital region (38%) and cheeks (30%) affected by facial contact dermatitis in a study conducted in Bareilly.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Role of Patch Testing in Facial Contact Dermatitis: A Cross-Sectional Study from Central India

Yadav,

Ganguly,

Singh

2024

Indian Dermatology Online Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Facial contact dermatitis is an emerging skin disorder due to the use of a large array of materials over the face. It leads to psychological distress in patients, impacting their quality of life. Most of the allergens applied over the face vary as per cosmetic or herbal products’ availability, usage, or religious practices. Identifying and discontinuing the implicated allergens will lead to a better prognosis and reduced morbidity in clinical practice. Objectives: To determine the frequency of different allergens responsible for causing facial contact dermatitis, in an urban part of central India, using patch test with the help of Indian standard and cosmetic series. Materials and Methods: All suspected patients (>18 years) of facial contact dermatitis visiting the outpatient department of dermatology were patch tested with both Indian standard and cosmetic series. Results: Out of 38/58 patch-test-positive patients, 71.06% were females, and 28.94% were males. Most patch-test-positive females were housewives. The most common allergens implicated were thiomersal (17.24%), followed by fragrance mix (15.51%), and paraphenylene diamine (12.06%). Conclusion: In our study, forehead and malar areas were most commonly involved indicating fairness creams and perfumes as the important contributors to facial contact dermatitis. Antigen batteries need to be updated with changing social and cultural trends, as many with a consistent history of aggravation with some products tested negative in patch tests.

show abstract

Addressing diagnostic challenges in suspected contact dermatitis to cosmetics: Can standard series and patient material suffice for patch test?

Verma,

Ahuja,

Taneja

2024

Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of Suspected Cosmetic Induced Facial Dermatoses with the Use of Indian Standard Series and Cosmetic Series Patch Test

Cited by 4 publications

References 13 publications

Systematic review on skin adverse effects of important hazardous hair cosmetic ingredients with a focus on hairdressers

Systematic review on skin adverse effects of important hazardous hair cosmetic ingredients with a focus on hairdressers

Role of Patch Testing in Facial Contact Dermatitis: A Cross-Sectional Study from Central India

Addressing diagnostic challenges in suspected contact dermatitis to cosmetics: Can standard series and patient material suffice for patch test?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About