2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-9140(00)00663-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of suspected interferents for TNT detection by ion mobility spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IMS is a well-known method to analyze chemical substance using gas-phase mobility in a weak electric field [14][15][16], and is more and more used in the detection of explosives, drugs, chemical warfare agents, biological and medical samples [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Unlike the mass spectrometry [26,27], which operates in vacuum, IMS detects chemical compounds at atmospheric pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IMS is a well-known method to analyze chemical substance using gas-phase mobility in a weak electric field [14][15][16], and is more and more used in the detection of explosives, drugs, chemical warfare agents, biological and medical samples [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Unlike the mass spectrometry [26,27], which operates in vacuum, IMS detects chemical compounds at atmospheric pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is successful due to its high sensitivity, portability and rapid analysis but specificity can be an issue. [23] There are known molecules within the forensics community that have similar mobility spectra to molecules of interest, which can cause false positives. MS is advantageous as it combines high sensitivity and rapid analysis with excellent specificity.…”
Section: Chemical Forensics For National Security Trace Detection Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a feature the presence of a prominent artifact with a drift time of 16.2 ms. Subsequent experiments that spiked TNT on a filter region devoid of polymer were unable to detect TNT, indicating that the lack of signal for TNT resulted from competitive ionization [15,16]. An H 2 (dihed) ligand standard gave a signal with a longer drift time (~20.9 ms) than the artifact.…”
Section: Filter Backgroundsmentioning
confidence: 99%