2003
DOI: 10.3368/jhr.xxxviii.4.891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Swedish Youth Labor Market Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This procedure was repeated until balance was obtained. 18 Focusing on the covariate means or the standardized difference in means is in line with several other applications of propensity score matching (see for example Smith and Todd, 2004;Sianesi, 2002;Wahba, 1999 andand Larsson, 2003). Previous literature does not give any guidance, when it comes to what levels of standardized absolute differences in means are acceptable.…”
Section: Empirical Methods and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This procedure was repeated until balance was obtained. 18 Focusing on the covariate means or the standardized difference in means is in line with several other applications of propensity score matching (see for example Smith and Todd, 2004;Sianesi, 2002;Wahba, 1999 andand Larsson, 2003). Previous literature does not give any guidance, when it comes to what levels of standardized absolute differences in means are acceptable.…”
Section: Empirical Methods and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…divorce) will be estimated by propensity score matching. This method originates in statistics Rubin, 1983, 1984) and has lately received increasing attention in economics (See Heckman et al, 1997;Wahba, 1999, 2002;Sianesi, 2001Sianesi, , 2002Lechner, 2002a, b;Larsson, 2003 andSmith andTodd, 2004). There are two main advantages of propensity score matching, over other non-experimental evaluation methods.…”
Section: Empirical Methods and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, both at the OECD (OECD, 1996) and European Union (European Commission, 1998) levels, labour market programmes are increasingly viewed as important measures to reduce long-term unemployment. 4 Microeconometric studies looking at the relative effects of Swedish programmes include among others Carling and Gustafson (1999) for self-employment subsidies versus subsidised jobs, Melkersson (1999a, b) and Frölich, Heshmati and Lechner (2000) for programmes targeted at the disabled, Larsson (2000) for youth programmes, Johansson and Martinson (2000) for two types of labour market training programmes and Carling and Richardson (2001) for the relative efficiency of eight of the Swedish programmes. Evaluations of differential programme impacts outside the Swedish context include the recent work by Gerfin and Lechner (2000) for Switzerland and by Brodaty, Crépon and Fougère (2000) as well as Bonnal, Fougère and Sérandon (1997) for France, and the earlier work by Ridder (1986) for the Netherlands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, results from two studies on persons who received training at approximately the same time as our third cohort are comparable. The studies are Regnér (1997) and Larsson (2000), the latter focusing on young adults. It is interesting to note that Friedlander et al (1997), when summarizing a number of evaluations of labor market training programs in the United States, drew similar conclusions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these studies have focused on particular groups. Examples include Edin (1988) who studied training among workers displaced by a pulp plant closing in 1977, in a small town in the north of Sweden; Ackum (1991) who studied persons aged 16-24 in Stockholm in 1981;and Larsson (2000) who analyzed persons aged 20-24 who became unemployed during 1992 and 1993.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%