1991
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199111000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of T1NoMo Lung Cancer with CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one series CT did not correctly alter the stage or affect manage-ment in any of 38 T1 tumours [102]. However, others have found evidence of irresectable disease in up to one third of patients and advocate its use [97,103].…”
Section: Distant Metastasis (M) M0mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In one series CT did not correctly alter the stage or affect manage-ment in any of 38 T1 tumours [102]. However, others have found evidence of irresectable disease in up to one third of patients and advocate its use [97,103].…”
Section: Distant Metastasis (M) M0mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Some authors focused on clinical T1N0M0 tumours and concluded that routine CT scanning did not correctly stage their patient population [65]. However, others have found evidence for unresectable spread of disease in up to one-third of patients with T1N0M0 lung cancer and advocate routine preoperative CT in these patients [66]. Other variables such as differences in CT scanners, the scanning technique used and variation in the compulsiveness of surgical staging may also affect sensitivity and specificity of CT.…”
Section: The N-factormentioning
confidence: 99%