2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of TanDEM-X DEMs on selected Brazilian sites: Comparison with SRTM, ASTER GDEM and ALOS AW3D30

Abstract: A first assessment of the TanDEM-X DEMs over Brazilian territory is presented through a comparison with SRTM, ASTER GDEM and ALOS AW3D30 DEMs in seven study areas with distinct geomorphological contexts, vegetation coverage, and land use. Visual analysis and elevation histograms point to a finer effective spatial (i.e., horizontal) resolution of TanDEM-X compared to SRTM and ASTER GDEM. In areas of open vegetation, TanDEM-X lower elevations indicate a deeper penetration of the radar signal. DEMs of differences… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
102
0
13

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
11
102
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The global altimetric error of the SRTM‐GL1 DEM is reported to be less than 6 m (Farr et al, ; Rabus, Eineder, Roth, & Bamler, ). Bonfietti‐Marini et al () estimated the average altimetric error (considering TOPODATA DEM data) in the Pantanal sub‐basin to be 3.64 m. Grohmann () compared the SRTM‐GL1 in the PHB against the ASTER GDEM30 and ALOS AW3D30 datasets and found the SRTM dataset to have the least amount of absolute vertical error of any available dataset for the region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global altimetric error of the SRTM‐GL1 DEM is reported to be less than 6 m (Farr et al, ; Rabus, Eineder, Roth, & Bamler, ). Bonfietti‐Marini et al () estimated the average altimetric error (considering TOPODATA DEM data) in the Pantanal sub‐basin to be 3.64 m. Grohmann () compared the SRTM‐GL1 in the PHB against the ASTER GDEM30 and ALOS AW3D30 datasets and found the SRTM dataset to have the least amount of absolute vertical error of any available dataset for the region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, 11 topographic parameters (including elevation, slope, aspect, shaded relief, profile convexity, plan convexity, longitudinal convexity, cross sectional convexity, minimum curvature, maximum curvature, and root-mean-square error) were generated from the ASTER GDEM V2 data using the Topographic Modeling tool in the ENVI v5.3 software package. The vertical datum of the TanDEM-X 90 m DEM is the WGS 84 ellipsoid, while SRTM DEM data are referenced to the EGM96 geoid [68]. The ellipsoidal height should be converted to the orthometric height through adding the geoid undulation [68].…”
Section: Other Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vertical datum of the TanDEM-X 90 m DEM is the WGS 84 ellipsoid, while SRTM DEM data are referenced to the EGM96 geoid [68]. The ellipsoidal height should be converted to the orthometric height through adding the geoid undulation [68]. TanDEM-X data were then resampled to the spatial resolution of SRTM DEM data using a bilinear interpolation method.…”
Section: Other Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For DEM derivatives, which are prone to be distorted by noise and artefacts, the quality of the data affected the ability to identify large-scale spatial patterns. This question requires further investigation in the context of both DEM preprocessing techniques (Gallant et al, Dowling, 2012) and the potential to use newly available more detailed sources of elevation data (Grohmann, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%