2021
DOI: 10.17138/tgft(9)292-299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of ten perennial forage grasses for biomass and nutritional quality

Abstract: A study was carried out to evaluate 10 perennial forage grass accessions from 4 species for herbage dry matter yield and nutritional quality at Holetta Agricultural Research Center. The evaluated grasses species and varieties were one Desho grass (Pennisetum) variety Kulumsa, four Urochloa decumbens (ILRI-14721, ILRI-14720, ILRI-13205 and ILRI-10871), three Urochloa ruziziensis (ILRI-14813, ILRI-14774 and ILRI-13332) and two Setaria sphacelata (ILRI-143 and ILRI-6543) accessions. Plant height and forage dry ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The CP values of the grass fodder species were observed to be above the critical value of 7.5% which is reported to be required for proper digestion ( Figure 3 ). This was in accordance with the findings of Faji et al, Gate et al and Abebe et al [ 19 , 20 , 21 ],where the CP values were obtained in the range of 5.04% (Desho grass) to 6.98% ( Setaria sphacelata ), 6.13% to 9.63% (Baja × Napier hybrid) and 7.24% ( Cenchrus ciliaris ) to 8.90% ( Chrysopogon aucheri ). Conversely, it was in contrast with the findings of Adebayo et al [ 22 ],who reported thatthe values of CP were from 9.49% to 25.86% in Guinea grass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The CP values of the grass fodder species were observed to be above the critical value of 7.5% which is reported to be required for proper digestion ( Figure 3 ). This was in accordance with the findings of Faji et al, Gate et al and Abebe et al [ 19 , 20 , 21 ],where the CP values were obtained in the range of 5.04% (Desho grass) to 6.98% ( Setaria sphacelata ), 6.13% to 9.63% (Baja × Napier hybrid) and 7.24% ( Cenchrus ciliaris ) to 8.90% ( Chrysopogon aucheri ). Conversely, it was in contrast with the findings of Adebayo et al [ 22 ],who reported thatthe values of CP were from 9.49% to 25.86% in Guinea grass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The CP, NDF, ADF, ADL contents, and IVDMD of Desho grass in the present study were higher than in other studies (Bimrew et al, 2017;Mulisa et al, 2021). The CP content of Desho grass was also higher than that reported in different studies (Denbela and Demerew, 2021;Teshale et al, 2021).…”
Section: Nutritive Value Of Herbage and Straw Yieldscontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…The yield performance of different forage crops vary due to differences in genetic make-up and their differential response to the growing environments. The recent study done at Holetta indicated that Desho grass had greater herbage DM accumulation compared to other perennial forage species (Mulisa et al, 2021). The mean herbage DM accumulation observed in this study for Desho grass (Bimrew, 2016;Tekalegn et al, 2017;Denbela et al, 2020;Teshale et al, 2021); Rhodes grass (Brima, 2011;Allah and Bello, 2019); Oat/ vetch mixtures (Getnet, 1999;Fantahun, 2016); and sole oat (Fekede, 2004;Getnet et al, 2004) were different compared to their respective DM yield reported by different scholars.…”
Section: Yield Performance Of Forage and Food Cropsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, additional water could increase lignin content (Qu et al, 2014). There are negative relationships between NDF, ADF and ADL content and nutrient digestibility (Faji et al, 2021;Kondo et al, 2015;Puteri et al, 2015;Wahyono et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria for good BMR types can be determined by the growth and digestibility of the plants (Sriagtula et al, 2017). For effective animal feed management, it is very important to provide information on the chemical content of available potential forages (Faji et al, 2021). The present study was therefore designed to evaluate the yield, nutrient profile and in vitro digestibility of new BMR mutant lines of sorghum forage in Indonesia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%