2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icdar.2017.204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Texture Descriptors for Validation of Counterfeit Documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data set of all probabilities in HMM is given in Fig ( 9). Table (1) shows the path number (i), its formula, and its probability value where i=1, 2,….,16. Consequently, in Fig( 10) it was found that the most frequently occurring event is the most probable path 9, when the number of deposits is twice.…”
Section: Fig (9): All Probability Values Of All Paths For the States ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data set of all probabilities in HMM is given in Fig ( 9). Table (1) shows the path number (i), its formula, and its probability value where i=1, 2,….,16. Consequently, in Fig( 10) it was found that the most frequently occurring event is the most probable path 9, when the number of deposits is twice.…”
Section: Fig (9): All Probability Values Of All Paths For the States ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is to obtain the numerical results using the Markov model and the hidden Markov model to predict the values of banknotes and whether if they are fake or not. # sequence of observations >observations=c("notFake","Fake","notFake","notFake","notFake","Fake","Fake") >viterbi(hmm,observations) [1] "typeA" "typeA" "typeA" "typeA" "typeA" "typeA" "typeA"…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors used a lab-made dataset of forgeries by scanning genuine euro bills and then printed counterfeits with an HP LaserJet printer. In a follow-up paper [25], Berenguel et al proposed a different classification method, but still used the same procedure to generate lab-made counterfeit samples for evaluation. All of these papers have a common limitation that the results are only valid for the specific counterfeit samples used in the study.…”
Section: B Attack On Fingerprintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, we do not require any dataset of forgeries for training. Instead of merely classifying a banknote into a binary result of "real" or "forgery" like in [18]- [25], our technique extracts a unique fingerprint from a physical banknote. The authentication of a banknote starts with a null hypothesis that it is a "forgery" until this hypothesis is compellingly rejected by statistics.…”
Section: B Attack On Fingerprintsmentioning
confidence: 99%