2014
DOI: 10.17226/22291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the 13 Controlling Criteria for Geometric Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A separate study using only young (18–25 years old) or old (65+ years old) drivers found that values for the mean and standard deviation of deceleration rates were smaller than the values currently used in AASHTO design guidance ( 3 ). These results indicated that the mean deceleration rate was 0.48 g’s with a standard deviation of 0.03 g’s.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A separate study using only young (18–25 years old) or old (65+ years old) drivers found that values for the mean and standard deviation of deceleration rates were smaller than the values currently used in AASHTO design guidance ( 3 ). These results indicated that the mean deceleration rate was 0.48 g’s with a standard deviation of 0.03 g’s.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…To facilitate this, design criteria have been developed and adopted by transportation agencies. Stopping sight distance (SSD) is considered a fundamental street design criterion that is necessary for safe roadway design ( 1 3 ). It is one of the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) controlling criteria, underscoring its importance among geometric design elements ( 4 , 5 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was also noted in the Mason and Mahoney state policy review [10]. NCHRP Report 783 also recommends the treatment of the design speed differently than other criteria and recommends discouraging or even prohibiting its use as a design exception [11] Another issue of bridge replacement projects is the need for wider lanes on the bridge, since current design guidance could often require a wider roadway width across the bridge. In most cases, approaches to older bridges have a narrower roadway width than the proposed width.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A recent NCHRP study [11] examined the 13 criteria in order to determine current relationships between them and safety and operational considerations. The study also reviewed each criterion in a critical manner in order to determine its significance in current design efforts and whether it should be retained for future use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dimensions of the highway lanes and the 18.3 m (60-ft) adjacent right-of-way including the foreslope, level ground, and backslope which may be covered by vegetation, BMP, or bare soil is shown in Figure 1. A 1.5% typical cross-slope of an interstate highway is used for drainage purposes according to the literature [16][17][18]. The adjacent right-of-way area at the side of the idealized highway (S1) is divided into three subcatchments: foreslope (S2), level ground (S3), and backslope (S4).…”
Section: Idealized Catchmentmentioning
confidence: 99%